stringtranslate.com

Susan Speer

Susan "Sue" Speer C.Psychol, FHEA is a senior lecturer at the School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester.[1]

From 2005 to 2006 Speer was an ESRC-SSRC collaborative visiting fellow in the department of sociology at the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA).[2]

Selected bibliography

Forthcoming

Books

Chapters in books

With a response by Hammersley, Martyn: 'Analytics' are no substitute for methodology: A response to Speer and Hutchby

Journal articles

With a response: Edley, Nigel (February 2001). "Conversation analysis, discursive psychology and the study of ideology: A response to Susan Speer" (PDF). Feminism & Psychology. 11 (1): 136–140. doi:10.1177/0959353501011001007. S2CID 144581261.
Rejoinder: Speer, Susan A. (February 2001). "Participants' orientations, ideology and the ontological status of hegemonic masculinity: A rejoinder to Nigel Edley". Feminism & Psychology. 11 (1): 141–144. doi:10.1177/0959353501011001008. S2CID 17569624.
With a response: Tenhave, Paul (August 2002). "Ontology or methodology? Comments on Speer's 'natural' and 'contrived' data: a sustainable distinction?". Discourse Studies. 4 (4): 527–530. doi:10.1177/14614456020040040701. S2CID 144909877.
With a response: Lynch, Michael (August 2002). "From naturally occurring data to naturally organized ordinary activities: comment on Speer". Discourse Studies. 4 (4): 531–537. doi:10.1177/14614456020040040801. S2CID 144475763.
With a response: Potter, Jonathan (August 2002). "Two kinds of natural" (PDF). Discourse Studies. 4 (4): 539–542. doi:10.1177/14614456020040040901. S2CID 143700255.
Rejoinder: Speer, Susan A. (August 2002). "Transcending the 'natural'/'contrived' distinction: a rejoinder to ten Have, Lynch and Potter". Discourse Studies. 4 (4): 543–548. doi:10.1177/14614456020040041001. S2CID 144543307.
With a response: Hammersley, Martyn (May 2003). "'Analytics' are no substitute for methodology: A response to Speer and Hutchby". Sociology. 37 (2): 339–351. doi:10.1177/0038038503037002007. S2CID 145494569.
Rejoinder: Speer, Susan A.; Hutchby, Ian (May 2003). "Methodology needs analytics: A rejoinder to Martyn Hammersley". Sociology. 37 (2): 353–359. doi:10.1177/0038038503037002008. S2CID 145625028.
A response to: Sims-Schouten, Wendy; Riley, Sarah C.E.; Willig, Carla (February 2007). "Critical realism in discourse analysis: A presentation of a systematic method of analysis using women's talk of motherhood, childcare and female employment as an example". Theory & Psychology. 17 (1): 101–124. doi:10.1177/0959354307073153. S2CID 145646326.
A response to: Whelan, Pauline (October 2012). "Oxymoronic and sociologically monstrous? Feminist conversation analysis". Qualitative Research in Psychology. 9 (4): 279–291. doi:10.1080/14780887.2011.634360. S2CID 142647421.
Rejoinder: Whelan, Pauline (October 2012). "Glossing conversation analysis with feminism?". Qualitative Research in Psychology. 9 (4): 303–313. doi:10.1080/14780887.2011.634362. S2CID 142529815.
A response to: Miller, Paul K. (December 2012). "Arsène didn't see it: Coaching, research and the promise of a discursive psychology" (PDF). International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching. 7 (4): 615–635. doi:10.1260/1747-9541.7.4.615. S2CID 73627186. Pdf of pp. 615–646.

References

  1. ^ Wetherell, Margaret (2009), "List of contributors xiii", in Wetherell, Margaret (ed.), Theorizing identities and social action, Identity Studies in the Social Sciences, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire England New York: Palgrave Macmillan, p. xiii, ISBN 9780230580886.
  2. ^ Freed, Alice; Ehrlich, Susan (2010), "Contributors", in Freed, Alice; Ehrlich, Susan (eds.), Why do you ask? the function of questions in institutional discourse, Oxford New York: Oxford University Press, p. xiv, ISBN 9780195306903.

External links