stringtranslate.com

Talk:Prayer


New quote

Perhaps {{cquote|If you talk to God, you are praying. If God talks to you, you have schizophrenia. - Thomas S. Szasz<ref>[http://thinkexist.com/quotation/if_you_talk_to_god-you_are_praying-if_god_talks/225684.html Thomas Szasz quotes]</ref> }} can be included

Article scope

Clearly, the article topic here is the comparative discussion of "prayer" in anthropology and comparative religion. What the article should not focus on, by WP:SS:

What the article should provide:

Needless to say, all of it based on the relevant academic literature. --dab (𒁳) 10:41, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

I have noticed that the lead has been significantly truncated recently, with information about the efficacy of prayer and history of prayer omitted. I can't date this change but I note there was no discussion on the talk page about rewriting the lead? I can understand rationale - to avoid controversial statements - however the lead must summarise all sections of the article, per WP:LEAD. I have reincorporated a couple of sentences that I believe address several topics within the article. I would appreciate some discussion here before these revisions are reverted. --Hazhk (talk) 15:49, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Supine prayers?

The traditional posture of prayer in medieval Europe is kneeling or supine with clasped hands. Was supine (laying on your back) really a traditional prayer stance? The only illustrations I've seen of someone apparently praying in that position is effigies on tombs, which I expect is an artistic convention rather than an example of how they actually prayed. A quick Google search for medieval images of people praying returns almost exclusively kneeling (on one knee or two), and a few standing. I'm sure I've also seen images of people praying prostrate as well, but they didn't show up in the search. Did people actually pray in a supine position, or is this an error (possibly a confusion between supine and prone)? Iapetus (talk) 21:47, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article issues and classification

Greetings, this article fails the B-class criteria (#1). There are: