Hope you have not abandoned the Jinn RfC. It would be a shame to abandon all that work. --Louis P. Boog (talk) 22:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Louis P. Boog I am not sure present RfC is addressing your questions. Still, I suggested all you three to write summary of every talk page discussion section uptil now first - since most users would not understand nuances of the issues you are trying to maintain, for example other users would not understand difference between why some thing is essential but not central and that essential deserves more coverage (in your opinion)- and then prepare for RfC of your (LPB's) own questions.
- The reasons of delay: All you three are not around at the same time that seem to slow the pace. Also @VenusFeuerFalle noted here if discussion getting settled by silence then don't enflame, so discussion facilitator's role is not to enflame, hence my silence until your comment. Anyways, your edits are self evident issue is not settled. Bookku (talk) 04:01, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm all in favor of not enflaming. --Louis P. Boog (talk) 02:51, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Louis P. Boog, The discussions up til now, you have shown great amount of patience and I have lot of appreciation for you.
- Here I was explaining my own silence for a while and VFF also was also referring to their own silence for a while, that's it. Bookku (talk) 04:21, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Anything else to do before the RfC? ... and will the RfC wait until July 31?--Louis P. Boog (talk) 16:50, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Questions: Shouldn't the sentence added to the lede in sandbox proposed changes
Many Muslim scholars, believe that belief in Jinn is essential to the Islamic faith, since jinn are mentioned in the Quran.[1](p33)
- be one of the Proposed additions of text on the talk page? Or am I missing something? --Louis P. Boog (talk) 20:33, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Louis P. Boog :) It's your sandbox talk page after all feel free and help yourself to add more. I left 5th slot blank for such purpose only. You add it I shall check it once you add.
- Another important thing is decide for yourself chronologically you wish to take it on first number or last one? My suggestion, this one being in the lead, to take it up later or last. Bookku (talk) 05:55, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- added to the 5th slot. Louis P. Boog (talk) 18:46, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Louis P. Boog
- I understand we get little fatigued by repeating same references among ourselves and in further mentions we tend to overlook whether our ref links are properly opening or not, but for uninvolved users visiting RfCs it can be 'put off'. I suggest (always) fill ref links properly so not to appear broken after some one clicks it.
- look OK? --Louis P. Boog (talk) 16:53, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree it's high time to start first RfC, but before that
- 1) First impression is best impression: See if you wish to open a new section at Talk:Jinn relisting your and Eagle's list of academic reliable sources (emphasis on academic) which support claim "important scope exists to increase the weight, without it being undue." The list is already there with you, suggesting just a relist since 'Ready relisting' will save RfC user's search effort.
- 2) (I know it's there in the sources still) Include or Be ready with original source quotes that support wordings like "Many Muslim scholars", "an integral part", "completely accepted", 'prominently featured'
- 3) I suppose, most preferably, you should be available for at least couple of weeks once we launch RfC Please confirm you are not planning on any long wiki-break, so we can start the first of your RfC. Bookku (talk) 09:37, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- wikibreak aug.2-4, Sept.1-6 Louis P. Boog (talk) 12:01, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- When the time comes I'd like to be able to make a slight change to "User:Louis P. Boog says that is not sufficient enough and important scope exists to increase the weight." ... adding something like "with concise statements". I don't want to sound like a windbag. --Louis P. Boog (talk) 21:04, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you describe 'the sentence you expect' with little more detail? Bookku (talk) 05:57, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I added a phrase Louis P. Boog (talk) 18:45, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I hope you are doing well!
I have created a brief profile for myself, and uploaded it more than once. So far, it does not show. I don't know why. It is supposed to be linked to https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abbas_Tashakkori&action=edit&redlink=1
Any advice is appreciated.
Abbas Tashakkori --Enlight710 (talk) 13:49, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My first attempt to get an admin review was Gaismagorm (24 June) who I found when they had replied to a post on WP:ANI. He replied to me "I am terribly sorry, but I am not an administrator." I went to the pages of some other editors who had posted on WP:ANI and saw no indication they were admins, (or state they are not admins, as in the case of an active volunteer Robert McClenon) so after that I picked names from List_of_administrators/Active --Louis P. Boog (talk) 14:58, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
Nünlist-2015 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
