User talk:Dan Wang

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Dan Wang! I am Marcus Qwertyus and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out Wikipedia:Questions, or feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. Again, welcome!

Marcus Qwertyus 05:22, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Republican Party presidential primaries results, 2012 map

I really cant find my way around these svg maps, so I write to you about it. You fine changes have been reverted by Bielsko, that apparently havent understood the difference betwin old projections, popular vote and a plurality in delegates.

He is right in one thing though. Colorado did go to Romney. Even though some say that the uncommitted delegates are Paul supporters it can be used to show plurality because the officially are uncommitted and that is all what matters when it comes to plurality. So maybe you can change Colorado from Santorum to Romney too?

He also says that Michigan is tied, That must be simple ignorance since Romney got 16 delegates to Santorums 14. Better to just ignore that.

But according to a map showing who won plurality (what really for the first time ever matters with the new five states rule (40)) then it is right that Maine, Missouri, Iowa, Louisiana and Washington are still undecided and since they have caucuses that didnt allocated delegates no candidate can show plurality before delegates are actually elected. (not even in Louisiana where some delegates are allocated)

I explain all this in Talk:Republican Party presidential primaries, 2012#How do we count states carried or won?

Even though Mr. Bielsko doesnt know excactly what he is talking about he is right. If the map are to show what matters in the real world (Plurality) it should be done consistent. And I am such a idiot with maps, so to persuade you to do the work (please).

Changes:

Minnesota = Paul

Colorado and Virgin Islands = Romney

Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Missouri and Washington State = Undecided (gray)

I hope you have the time to make the map better. When it is done I can write the new notes in the infobox if you like. Jack Bornholm (talk) 16:40, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Now I have actually made a map with all the changes I talk about (my first SVG map) but I simply cant figure out how to upload it to the File:Republican Party presidential primaries results, 2012.svg. If you want to teach me please send me a note explaining it on my talkpage: User talk:Jack Bornholm Jack Bornholm (talk) 19:58, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Empire Strikes Back (disambiguation)

(User warning given in error by me on 28 May removed). Ubcule (talk) 14:40, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(Comment copied from my talk page): The Falklands War was popularly dubbed "The Empire Strikes Back" by Time Magazine (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/7a/The_empire_strikes_back_newsweek.jpg) and other media sources. It's not called that much anymore, but it definitely isn't nonsense. Dan Wang (talk) 15:34, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, fair point- though it probably would have been useful to have clarified this on the dab page. :-) My apologies for slapping a "test2" on you(!)

I suspect that this was an American media thing, as it's never really been known as that in the UK. If you think it would be genuinely useful, feel free to put it back with the explanation. All the best, Ubcule (talk) 21:33, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dan Wang. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dan Wang. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Help with editing and debugging

You added this to the page of the National Resistance Front in Afghanistan

website = nrfafg.org

§https://www.nationalresistance.org/en/about-us/about-us.html

Note the official website is http://nationalresistance.org/

https://twitter.com/Sibghat_Ah/status/1494329037652561920?s=20&t=_GMG6JChWQ6FmxsPE4aLtg The source is the spokesman for the National Resistance Front in Afghanistan and the spokesman for the National Resistance Front in Afghanistan

And I announced that before you added this site to this page, and thus we ask you to modify it to the official and only site and site that you added from the supporters, and it is not official and has nothing to do with the National Resistance Front in Afghanistan, and I am speaking with you from the office of the spokesman and the head of strategic communications — Preceding unsigned comment added by EBUBAKIR (talk • contribs) 22:39, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help with editing and debugging

You added this to the page of the National Resistance Front in Afghanistan

website = nrfafg.org

§https://www.nationalresistance.org/en/about-us/about-us.html

Note the official website is http://nationalresistance.org/

You added this to the page of the National Resistance Front in Afghanistan

website = nrfafg.org

§https://www.nationalresistance.org/en/about-us/about-us.html

Note the official website is http://nationalresistance.org/

You added this to the page of the National Resistance Front in Afghanistan

website = nrfafg.org #fake

https://www.nationalresistance.org/en/about-us/about-us.html

Note the official website is http://nationalresistance.org/

The tweet of the official spokesman and head of strategic communications for the National Resistance Front in Afghanistan

I want to point out again that nrfafg.com has nothing to do with the Front nor the Twitter account that was taken as the source, both are impostors and have nothing to do with the National Resistance Front in Afghanistan.

https://twitter.com/Sibghat_Ah/status/1523746137118756864?s=20&t=x7m1wOJb4dUMdsKm8a_KWg

The tweet of the official spokesman and head of strategic communications for the National Resistance Front in Afghanistan. EBUBAKIR (talk) 05:39, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I believe https://www.nrfafg.org is the genuine website. It's the one that the NRF's Twitter page links to (https://twitter.com/nrfafg), which is itself linked to by the NRF's Head of Foreign Relations (https://twitter.com/alinazary) Dan Wang (talk) 21:54, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir, what you are doing in modifying the registered website of the National Resistance Front in Afghanistan is incorrect

(((his is the website linked to by https://twitter.com/NRFafg, which is itself linked to by the NRF's Head of Foreign Relations, Ali Nazary (https://twitter.com/alinazary))))

Neither nrfafg is the twitter page of the National Resistance Front of Afghanistan, nor is the nrfafg.com website, so I ask you to check the spokesperson's office and the evidence you have provided.

https://twitter.com/Sibghat_Ah

https://twitter.com/AhmadMassoud01/status/1507061142757253132?s=20&t=CrBieuKQybAHJRj-uJmBMA

https://twitter.com/Sibghat_Ah/status/1523746137118756864?s=20&t=GAPQHkk88IzWsF_zzyUPog

This statement, issued by the spokesperson of the National Resistance Front, Sibghatullah Ahmadi, through his official Twitter account, clarifies the Twitter account and website of the National Resistance Front. Therefore, I ask that you check the information provided to you before making any decision. I ask you to return the site to what it was before and not to change anything unless it was officially issued by the competent authorities.

thank you in advance EBUBAKIR (talk) 09:32, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can see in the tweet the page that imitates us and you thought it was official. He forgot to delete the video in which the name of our site appears clearly. I think this evidence is enough to be convinced EBUBAKIR (talk) 09:41, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. More specifically, here. Noticed that the editor starting the discussion failed to notify you, in spite of requirements to, hence this message. AddWittyNameHere 07:27, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate the heads-up. I see the discussion was concluded without needing my input. Thanks for the speedy resolution. Dan Wang (talk) 17:53, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ali Maisam Nazary for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ali Maisam Nazary is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Maisam Nazary until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

The Article does not meet WP:GNG Parwiz ahmadi (talk) 12:37, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]