Today's story has 3 composers, I couldn't decide for the one on the Main page or the one who didn't make it on his bicentenary, so took both, and the pic has a third. Listen if you have a bit of time. The music, played by the Kyiv Symphony Orchestra in Germany in April 2022, impressed me. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:26, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Recommended reading today: Frye Fire, by sadly missed Vami_IV. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:06, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
I've certainly gone on record in the past that I believe film lists should be organized alphabetically — for one thing, the film titles are the most centrally important piece of information in the list, and for another, organizing it by commercial release date leaves films unable to be listed at all if they've screened at film festivals but haven't opened in the multiplexes yet (frex, I created several articles about Cannes-premiering films back in the spring which I wasn't able to add to List of French films of 2024 and had to list on the talk page for future reference instead, which isn't at all the way that should have gone.) Plus it also makes the list unnecessarily complicated to edit, because of all the rowspans that have to be adjusted every time a new film is added.
I don't think maintaining two separate sets of lists would be necessary, however — I don't see a problem with having release dates be present in the list as a supplementary column, and obviously if the lists are sortable then a reader who wants to see the films organized by release date can simply sort on that column — but I absolutely agree that the base sort order should be alphabetical rather than chronological, because the titles, not the dates, are the most salient and important characteristic of the list. (Chronological order is the right choice in cases where the specific succession order is important information in its own right, such as a list of holders of a specific political office, but the question of whether Blazing Saddles technically came out before or after Thieves Like Us is trivia, not a centrally defining characteristic of either film.)
I don't recall whether there's ever been a discussion at WP:NFILM to establish a consensus one way or the other, however. Bearcat (talk) 15:07, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
The article Jab Yaad Kisi Ki Aati Hai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Film article unsourced for 13 years. Article topic fails notability guidelines, and content is essentially an IMDB copy paste with no plot summary.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lenny Marks (talk) 21:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
The article Mount Rusha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unsourced for 12 years, not notable per GNG or NATFEAT.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lenny Marks (talk) 22:26, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Just coming down here to say hi and enquiring on how you're doing, my friend. Hope all is well. I am slowly getting back to active editing and might get back full-time soon. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 10:24, 22 September 2024 (UTC)