Oh hai! I'm in ur article fixing ur logic.
I hate weasel words, and will do my best to violently edit articles so they conform to the following principles:
If you're an editor who has found their way here, sorry in advance, I like to do a lot of WP:Cleanup since, it's way easier to tag incorrect or biased statements than it is to cite a more trustworthy source. I administer the Bad Citation Bot
I don't like to accept information just because it's in vogue, sometimes this means I stir the pot with my edits. I would appreciate if you make an effort to modify my edits instead of reverting them wholesale, I like Wikipedia to have a variety of opinions, and sometimes this means my edits are overzealous, but I don't have all kinds of time to make them perfect. I've taken to running some experiments, to test the editorial process of the wiki, whether it can be trusted as neutral, and to what extent it allows weaker evidence. I would never create an article I believed to contain outright falsehood, but conveniently history is stranger than fiction so there's plenty of strange phenomenon, which is not well documented, but can said to have some encyclopedic value. In other words I like creating articles which I expect to be kept, but which are likely to have strong discussion.