stringtranslate.com

Interstate Highway standards

Blank markers used for one- and two-digit (left) or three-digit and suffixed (right) Interstates

Standards for Interstate Highways in the United States are defined by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) in the publication A Policy on Design Standards: Interstate System. For a certain highway to be considered an Interstate Highway, it must meet these construction requirements or obtain a waiver from the Federal Highway Administration.

Standards

Standardization helps keep road design consistent, such that drivers can learn the consistent features and drive accordingly.[1][2] Standardization can therefore decrease accidents and increase driver safety.[3]

An Interstate Highway under construction (I-196), with both directions of traffic moved to one side of the roadway
I-94 in Michigan, showing examples of non-interchange overpass signage in median, upcoming exit signage on right shoulder, a 1950s overpass with height restriction signage, newly installed cable median barrier, and parallel grooved pavement with shoulder rumble strips
An Interstate Highway bridge with an asphalt overlay
The Bobby Hopper Tunnel on I-49 in Arkansas was built with a 25 ft (7.6 m) height total clearance, leaving plenty of room for lighting and signs hanging from the ceiling and still exceeding the 16 ft (4.9 m) minimum for rural highways. Side clearances were reduced from the recommended 44.0 ft (13.4 m) to 38.0 ft (11.6 m) due to cost concerns.

These standards are, as of May 2023:

Exceptions

A narrow, older "grandfathered" section of I-94/I-69 after entering Michigan from Sarnia, Ontario. This section has since been reconstructed to modern standards.[5]

The standards have been changed over the years, resulting in many older Interstates not conforming to the current standards, and yet others are not built to standards because to do so would be too costly or environmentally unsound.

Some roads were grandfathered into the system. Most of these were toll roads that were built before the Interstate system came into existence or were under construction at the time President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956. One example is the Pennsylvania Turnpike, which originally had a very narrow median that later required the installation of a steel guardrail and later a Jersey barrier due to heavy traffic loads.[citation needed] The Kansas Turnpike had a 20-foot (6.1 m) depressed median (16 feet [4.9 m] narrower than the Interstate minimum) along its entire 236-mile (380 km) length from its opening in 1956 through the mid-1980s when Jersey barriers were installed.[citation needed]

Interstate 35E through Saint Paul, Minnesota is an example of a freeway that was not grandfathered into the system that is nonetheless an exception to standards. Initially designed in the 1960s, but not opened until 1990, the freeway has a speed limit of 45 mph (72 km/h), and does not allow vehicles weighing over 9,000 pounds (4,100 kg) GVW. This is due to political opposition from surrounding homeowners in local neighborhoods, which greatly delayed and modified the project.[citation needed] Interstate 670, a spur of Interstate 70, also fails to reach the 50 mile per hour minimum and instead passes through Downtown Kansas City, Missouri at 45 miles per hour.[6]

Interstate 75 on the Mackinac Bridge between St. Ignace and Mackinaw City, Michigan, is undivided. The bridge was designed before the start of the Interstate Highway System, and it was grandfathered into the system.[7]

Interstate 93 super two through Franconia Notch, New Hampshire

Interstate 93 through Franconia Notch, New Hampshire is also a notable exception, being a super two parkway with a speed limit of 45 mph (72 km/h).

All the unsigned Interstates in Alaska and Puerto Rico are exempt from Interstate Highway standards and are instead, per Title 23, Chapter 1, Section 103 of the U.S. Code, "designed in accordance with such geometric and construction standards as are adequate for current and probable future traffic demands and the needs of the locality of the highway".[8]

References

  1. ^ Theeuwes, Jan; Godthelp, Hans (June 1995). "Self-explaining roads". Safety Science. 19 (2–3): 217–225. doi:10.1016/0925-7535(94)00022-U. ISSN 0925-7535.
  2. ^ Theeuwes, Jan (March 4, 2021). "Self-Explaining Roads: What Does Visual Cognition Tell Us About Designing Safer Roads?". Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications. 6 (1): 15. doi:10.1186/s41235-021-00281-6. ISSN 2365-7464. PMC 8030273. PMID 33661408.
  3. ^ Wegman, F (1995). "Influence of infrastructure design on road safety". International Symposium on Traffic Safety, A Global Issue.
  4. ^ a b c Staff (2001). A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (PDF) (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. pp. 507 (design speed), 510 (Exhibit 8–1: Maximum Grades for Rural and Urban Freeways). ISBN 1-56051-156-7. Retrieved April 11, 2014.
  5. ^ Port Huron Transportation Service Center. "I-94/I-69 Reconstruction in St. Clair County". Michigan Department of Transportation. Retrieved July 3, 2012.
  6. ^ "Interstate 670 Kansas / Missouri". 22 January 2019.
  7. ^ Rubin, Lawrence A. (1985). Bridging the Straits: The Story of Mighty Mac. Detroit: Wayne State University Press. ISBN 978-0-8143-1789-1.
  8. ^ United States Congress. "Title 23, Chapter 1, Section §103". U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved May 31, 2012.

External links