stringtranslate.com

Википедия:Перенаправления для обсуждения

Redirects for discussion ( RfD ) — это место, где обсуждаются потенциально проблемные редиректы . Элементы обычно остаются в списке около недели, после чего их удаляют, сохраняют или перенаправляют.

Пожалуйста, не переименовывайте и не меняйте цель перенаправления в одностороннем порядке, пока оно находится в стадии обсуждения. Это добавляет ненужных сложностей в обсуждение для участников и закрывающих.

Перед тем как перечислить перенаправление для обсуждения

Пожалуйста, ознакомьтесь с этими общими правилами, которые применяются здесь, как и в других местах:

Руководящие принципы RfD

Ярлык
  • WP:RGUIDE

Когда следует удалять перенаправление?


Ярлыки
  • WP:RFD#ВРЕДНЫЙ
  • ВП:РФД?

Основные причины, по которым удаление перенаправлений вредно :

  • перенаправление может содержать нетривиальную историю правок;
  • Если перенаправление достаточно старое (или является результатом перемещения страницы, которая находилась там уже довольно долго), то вполне возможно, что его удаление приведет к нарушению входящих ссылок (такие ссылки, поступающие из старых версий страниц Википедии, из сводок правок, из других проектов Викимедиа или из других мест в Интернете , не отображаются в разделе «Что здесь ссылается» ).

Поэтому рассмотрите возможность удаления только вредоносных перенаправлений или недавних.

Причины удаления

Ярлык
  • WP:RFD#УДАЛИТЬ

Вы можете захотеть удалить перенаправление, если выполняется одно или несколько из следующих условий ( но обратите внимание также на исключения, перечисленные ниже в этом списке ):

  1. Страница перенаправления неоправданно затрудняет для пользователей поиск статей с похожими названиями через поисковую систему. Например, если пользователь ищет «Новые статьи» и перенаправляется на страницу устранения неоднозначности для «Статьи», ему потребуется гораздо больше времени, чтобы добраться до недавно добавленных статей в Википедии.
  2. Перенаправление может вызвать путаницу. Например, если "Адам Б. Смит" был перенаправлен на "Эндрю Б. Смит", потому что Эндрю случайно назвали Адамом в одном источнике, это может вызвать путаницу со статьей об Адаме Смите , поэтому перенаправление следует удалить.
  3. Перенаправление является оскорбительным или злоупотребительным, например, перенаправление «Джо Блоггс — неудачник» на «Джо Блоггс» (если только «Джо Блоггс — неудачник» не обсуждается в статье обоснованно) или «Джо Блоггс» на «Лузер». ( Могут применяться критерии быстрого удаления G10 и G3 .) См. также § Нейтральность перенаправлений.
  4. Перенаправление представляет собой саморекламу или спам. ( Может применяться критерий быстрого удаления G11 .)
  5. Перенаправление не имеет смысла, например, перенаправление «Apple» на «Orange». ( Может применяться критерий быстрого удаления G1 .)
  6. Это перенаправление между пространствами имен из пространства статьи, например, указывающее на пространство имен User или Wikipedia. Главным исключением из этого правила являются перенаправления сокращений псевдопространства имен , которые технически находятся в основном пространстве статьи. Некоторые давние перенаправления между пространствами имен также сохраняются из-за их давней истории и потенциальной полезности. Например, перенаправления " MOS: " были исключением из этого правила, пока они не стали собственным пространством имен в 2024 году. (Обратите внимание также на существование псевдонимов пространств имен, таких как WP: . Критерий быстрого удаления R2 может применяться, если целевое пространство имен отличается от Category: , Template: , Wikipedia: , Help : или Portal: .)
  7. Если перенаправление сломано, то есть перенаправляет на статью, которая не существует, его можно немедленно удалить в соответствии с критерием быстрого удаления G8 . Вам следует проверить, нет ли альтернативного места, куда его можно было бы перенаправить в первую очередь, и что оно не было сломано в результате вандализма.
  8. Если перенаправление является новым или очень неясным синонимом названия статьи, которое не упоминается в цели, оно вряд ли будет полезным. В частности, перенаправления на языке, отличном от английского , на страницу, тема которой не связана с этим языком (или культурой, говорящей на этом языке), как правило, не должны создаваться. (Неправдоподобные опечатки или неправильные названия являются кандидатами на критерий быстрого удаления R3 , если они были созданы недавно.)
  9. Если целевую статью необходимо переместить в заголовок перенаправления, но перенаправление уже редактировалось и имеет свою историю, то заголовок необходимо освободить, чтобы освободить место для перемещения. Если перемещение не вызывает споров, пометьте перенаправление для быстрого удаления G6 или, в качестве альтернативы (с suppressredirectправами пользователя; доступно для перемещения страниц и администраторов), выполните круговое перемещение . Если нет, переместите статью в Запрошенные перемещения .
  10. Ярлык
    • WP:ВОЗВРАЩЕНО
    Если перенаправление можно было бы расширить до статьи, а целевая статья практически не содержит информации по теме.

Причины не удаления

Ярлык
  • WP:RFD#СОХРАНИТЬ

Однако избегайте удаления таких перенаправлений, если:

  1. У них есть потенциально полезная история страницы или история правок, которая должна быть сохранена для соответствия требованиям лицензирования для слияния (см. Wikipedia:Объединение и удаление ). С другой стороны, если перенаправление было создано путем переименования страницы с таким именем, а история страницы просто упоминает переименование, и по одной из причин выше вы хотите удалить страницу, скопируйте историю страницы на страницу обсуждения статьи, на которую она перенаправляет. Акт переименования является полезной историей страницы, и тем более, если было обсуждение имени страницы.
  2. Они будут способствовать случайному связыванию и сделают создание дубликатов статей менее вероятным, будь то путем перенаправления множественного числа на единственное, путем перенаправления частого неправильного написания на правильное написание, путем перенаправления неправильного названия на правильный термин, путем перенаправления на синоним и т. д. Другими словами, перенаправления без входящих ссылок не являются кандидатами на удаление по этим причинам , поскольку они приносят пользу просматривающему пользователю. Редакторам потребуется определенная дополнительная бдительность, чтобы свести к минимуму возникновение этих частых опечаток в тексте статьи, поскольку связанные опечатки не будут отображаться как неработающие ссылки; рассмотрите возможность пометки перенаправления шаблоном {{ R from misspelling }}, чтобы помочь редакторам отслеживать эти опечатки.
  3. Они помогают в поиске по определенным терминам. Например, пользователи, которые могут где-то увидеть упоминание " Keystone State ", но не знают, к чему это относится, смогут найти его в статье о Пенсильвании (цель).
  4. Удаление перенаправлений несет риск поломки входящих или внутренних ссылок. Например, перенаправления, возникающие в результате перемещения страниц, обычно не следует удалять без веской причины. Ссылки, которые существовали в течение значительного периода времени, включая ссылки CamelCase (например, WolVes ) и старые ссылки на подстраницы , следует оставить в покое на случай, если на них есть какие-либо существующие ссылки на внешних страницах. См. также Wikipedia:Link rot § Link rot on non-Wikimedia sites .
  5. Кто-то считает их полезными. Подсказка: если кто-то говорит, что считает перенаправление полезным, то, скорее всего, так оно и есть. Вы можете не найти его полезным — это не потому, что другой человек лжет, а потому, что вы просматриваете Википедию по-другому. Доказательства использования можно оценить, используя wikishark или инструмент просмотра страниц на перенаправлении, чтобы увидеть количество просмотров, которые оно получает.
  6. Перенаправление осуществляется на тесно связанную форму слова, например, из множественного числа в единственное .

Нейтральность перенаправлений

Ярлык
  • WP:RНЕЙТРАЛЬНЫЙ

Так же, как в некоторых обстоятельствах разрешены названия статей, использующие ненейтральный язык , так же разрешены и такие перенаправления. Поскольку перенаправления менее заметны для читателей, в их названиях допускается больше свободы, поэтому предполагаемое отсутствие нейтральности в названиях перенаправлений не является достаточной причиной для их удаления. В большинстве случаев ненейтральные, но проверяемые перенаправления должны указывать на нейтрально озаглавленные статьи о теме термина. Ненейтральные перенаправления могут быть помечены тегом .{{R from non-neutral name}}

Ненейтральные перенаправления обычно создаются по трем причинам:

  1. Статьи, созданные с использованием ненейтральных заголовков, обычно перемещаются в новый нейтральный заголовок, который оставляет старый ненейтральный заголовок в качестве рабочего перенаправления (например, Climategate → Электронная переписка Климатического исследовательского подразделения ).
  2. Статьи, созданные как форки POV, могут быть удалены и заменены перенаправлением, указывающим на статью, из которой произошел форк (например, мусульманские слухи о Бараке Обаме → удалены и теперь перенаправлены на религиозные теории заговора о Бараке Обаме ).
  3. Тематика статей может быть представлена ​​некоторыми источниками за пределами Википедии в ненейтральных терминах. Такие термины, как правило, избегаются в заголовках статей Википедии, в соответствии с рекомендациями по избеганию слов и общей политикой нейтральной точки зрения . Например, ненейтральное выражение « Attorneygate » используется для перенаправления на нейтрально озаглавленную статью Dismissal of US attorneys controversy . Статья, о которой идет речь, никогда не использовала этот заголовок, но перенаправление было создано для предоставления альтернативного способа ее достижения, поскольку в ряде сообщений прессы используется этот термин.

Исключениями из этого правила будут перенаправления, которые не являются устоявшимися терминами и вряд ли будут полезны, и поэтому могут быть номинированы на удаление, возможно, по причине удаления № 3. Однако, если перенаправление представляет собой устоявшийся термин, который используется в нескольких основных надежных источниках , его следует сохранить, даже если он не является нейтральным, поскольку это облегчит поиск по таким терминам. Пожалуйста, имейте в виду, что RfD не является местом для разрешения большинства редакционных споров.

Заключительные замечания

Подробности в инструкциях администратора для RfD

Согласно политике, номинации должны оставаться открытыми примерно в течение недели до их закрытия, если только они не соответствуют общим критериям быстрого удаления , критериям быстрого удаления перенаправления или не являются допустимыми запросами на обсуждение перенаправления (например, фактически являются запросами на перемещение ).

Как составить список перенаправлений для обсуждения

Ярлык
  • WP:RFDHOWTO

Текущий список

Ярлыки
  • WP:RFD#ТЕКУЩИЙ
  • WP:RFDCD
  • WP:RFDCL

11 ноября

разные земные персонажи

не упомянуто (в основном, belch упоминается в цитате), не очень важно (в основном, аргумент можно привести в пользу everdred и apple kid) cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:13, 11 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

разные земные сюжетные вещи

не упомянуто, и не очень важно, плюс-минус яблоко сюжетной экспозиции, которое упоминается один раз в игре и больше никогда не признается cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:02, 11 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Редкий покемон

ух ты, круто, как стартеры и окаменелости? редкость отдельного покемона трудно подсчитать, когда есть больше одной игры и больше одного способа получить покемона, и это упоминается только в цели как "блестящие покемоны редки, лол" cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:47, 11 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Жизнь без надежды

R без упоминания цели. Было много книг об этом парне. Зачем перенаправлять, если в статье, на которую он нацелен, нет информации о книге?

Также касается большинства других статей в категории:Документальные книги о Ричарде Рамиресе . Некоторые из этих книг, безусловно, примечательны, в этом случае WP:RETURNTORED , поскольку о них нет информации в целевой PARAKANYAA ( обсуждение ) 11:33, 11 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Рохит

Rohit Sharma — чрезвычайно популярная статья, и была под заголовком Rohit , но является ли Rohit Sharma основной темой для популярного имени «Rohit» (см. Rohit (имя) ). Если это так, то хорошо, останемся такими, какие мы есть, но я думаю, что это следует обсудить, потому что довольно необычно, чтобы имя перенаправлялось на человека, который, как не указано, известен под мононимом. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk ) 10:48, 11 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Ro (антиген)

Нам нужен эксперт, чтобы определить, правильно ли они нацелены. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk ) 09:57, 11 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Критика объектно-ориентированного программирования

Целевой раздел Object-oriented programming#Criticism больше не существует в этой форме, см. это изменение . В настоящее время нет входящих внутренних ссылок. Нет соответствующей истории правок в Criticism of object-oriented programming , которую нужно было бы сохранить. Tea2min ( talk ) 09:55, 11 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Список супертяжеловесов

Удалить. Это перенаправление предполагаемого смешного термина "Heavies", созданного редактором для перенаправления на его любимую игровую площадку. Термин ни в коем случае не является обычным и никогда не использовался кем-либо, кроме этого редактора, который любит ссылаться на эту страницу на страницах обсуждения. Я считаю это неправильным использованием страниц перенаправления. 47.67.225.78 ( обсуждение ) 07:12, 31 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Сохранить . Я не уверен, что понимаю аргумент IP? «Heavyes» — это просто... множественное число от «Heavy», используемое как существительное, как в SpaceX Super Heavy — я бы легко мог увидеть несколько ступеней ракет SpaceX Super Heavy, называемых «Super Heavyes». Если вы перейдете по указанной ссылке, вам, по сути, будет предоставлен список всех ступеней ракет Super Heavy, которые существовали. Если только не будет лучшей цели для перенаправления, мы останемся здесь. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫𝔙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 ( обсуждение ) 08:58, 31 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
Перенацельтесь на сверхтяжелый , как обсуждалось выше. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫𝔙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 ( обсуждение ) 10:47, 31 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответ ]
Готово. WP:BOLD :) 47.67.225.78 ( обсуждение ) 11:15, 31 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
Пожалуйста, не делайте этого. У нас все еще есть активный RfD; согласно тексту в самом верху этой самой страницы WP:RFD , очень нехорошая идея менять или переименовывать цель перенаправления, пока она обсуждается, поскольку это вызывает ненужные проблемы для закрывающего администратора и любых других участников обсуждения. Я отменил добросовестное редактирование здесь, но, пожалуйста, не делайте этого снова. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫𝔫�🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 ( обсуждение ) 15:39, 31 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответ ]
KEEP List of Super Heavies явно отличается от страницы disambuigation. Если хотите, его можно переименовать в List of Super Heavy Boosters.
Перенаправление на Super Heavy не имеет смысла. Просмотр просмотров страниц для каждой из страниц, перечисленных на странице disambuigation, может помочь определить, что люди думают, когда думают о "Super Heavy". Каждое число — это последнее количество просмотров страниц, перечисленных.
Сверхтяжелый ( Предлагаемая цель перенаправления ): 25, Без рейтинга (страница устранения помех)
Трансурановый элемент : 141, C-класс
Сверхтяжелый : 57, класс Stub
SuperHeavy (альбом) : 12, Старт-класс
SpaceX Super Heavy ( текущая цель перенаправления ): 1127, B-класс
Сверхтяжелый танк : 364, Стартовый класс
Текущая цель перенаправления имеет больше просмотров, чем все остальные. Вместе взятые. А затем почти удвоилась.
ПРАВКА Если что-то и должно быть целью перенаправления для «Списка сверхтяжелых ракет», так это должен быть сверхтяжелый ускоритель .
Кроме того, здесь обсуждается возможность превращения Списка сверхтяжелых кораблей в отдельную статью (наряду со Списком звездолетов ) .
Это не беспрецедентно: список ускорителей первой ступени Falcon 9 все-таки существует. Отредактировано II ( обсуждение ) 12:06, 1 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответ ]
Комментарий. В рекомендациях предлагается уведомить создателя перенаправления, если оно обсуждается: «Пожалуйста, уведомите добросовестного создателя и всех основных участников перенаправления».
Это не было сделано ни для этого, ни для предыдущего предложенного удаления. Редактировано II ( обсуждение ) 12:49, 1 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответ ]
Комментарий: « текущая цель перенаправления имеет больше просмотров, чем все остальные ». — это корыстно. Например, когда Google ищет в Википедии, он следует за перенаправлением и спамит результаты поиска с помощью ускорителя. Однако это не имеет значения, поскольку существуют другие важные «сверхтяжелые» значения, и перенаправление должно их учитывать. Я все еще думаю, что удаление было бы лучшим вариантом, но устранение амбиций — на втором месте. Сохранение бесполезно.
47.67.225.78 ( обсуждение ) 18:26, 1 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
Просмотры перенаправления статьи Super Heavy на короткое время увеличились примерно на 40 просмотров, что вполне соответствовало нормальному отклонению на тот момент (текущее отклонение составляет около 200 в день).
Текущее количество просмотров перенаправления составляет 10. 10 просмотров — это ничто, когда ежедневные колебания измеряются сотнями.
Это все еще ставит ее намного выше других страниц. Вместе взятых.
Кроме того, пользователи @ing участвуют в обсуждении создания Списка супертяжеловесов .
@ Ergzay , @ HLFan , @ Spookywooky2 Вы все были вовлечены в обсуждение, которое привело к созданию спорных перенаправлений. Отредактировано II ( обсуждение ) 15:24, 2 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
Это обсуждение было месяц назад, о "Списке звездолетов" и закончилось. Не имеет ничего общего с тем, что здесь обсуждается, но называйте помощников как хотите. Тем не менее, нет ничего, что называлось бы "Сверхтяжелые", это в лучшем случае множественное число, относящееся к нескольким сущностям, называемым "сверхтяжелыми", в худшем случае - чепуха. 47.67.225.78 ( обсуждение ) 16:28, 2 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
Обсуждение, которое привело к созданию перенаправления, является допустимым в обсуждении относительно потенциального удаления указанного перенаправления. Фактически, вы должны уведомить создателя перенаправления и всех основных участников. Вы не сделали этого ни для этой попытки удаления, ни для предыдущего предложенного удаления. Отредактировано II ( обсуждение ) 19:23, 2 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
@ 47.67.225.78 Пожалуйста, не предполагайте недобросовестность с такими заявлениями, как «задумано, чтобы быть смешным» и «личная игровая площадка». Это крайне неточно. Множественное число от Heavy в данном случае — Heavies или, возможно, Heavys. Это совершенно нормальное перенаправление. Ваша история постов показывает явную личную ненависть к Redacted II. Если вы продолжите такое поведение, я лично поставлю себе цель забанить вас по IP за такого рода травлю. Это совершенно неуместно. Ergzay ( talk ) 16:34, 2 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
Спасибо.
(Просто чтобы вы знали, я уже сообщал о них раньше, но администраторы не были заинтересованы в том, чтобы что-то с этим делать) Отредактировано II ( обсуждение ) 17:34, 2 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
Sock puppeting применяется только к аккаунтам, а не к IP-адресам, поэтому ваша проблема, вероятно, была усугублена тем, что вы не сообщили о вещах правильно. Также я думаю, что вы выбрали слишком много примеров просто несотрудничающих комментариев без достаточного количества примеров личных нападок. Соблюдайте конкретику в отчете. Нет такого правила, по которому вы не можете сделать второй отчет ANI после того, как прошло некоторое время с новыми событиями. Прошло три месяца. Напишите мне на мою страницу обсуждения, если вы это сделаете, и я поддержу вас, если будет достаточно доказательств. Ergzay ( обсуждение ) 22:19, 2 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответ ]
Вероятно, эта ошибка и погубила его.
Я дам им еще один шанс, прежде чем снова пробовать ANI. Отредактировано II ( обсуждение ) 23:46, 2 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
@ Ergzay. Забавно, как вы обвиняете меня в недобросовестности, при этом намекая на несколько других «проступков», которые были давно опровергнуты... Не могли бы вы и ваши приятели прекратить митинговать против меня? Похоже, это кампания по моей дискредитации и эта переписанная дискуссия, в то время как никаких фактических аргументов не приводится. Полностью вырваны из контекста и просто WP:PA 47.67.225.78 ( обсуждение ) 09:59, 4 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
Итак, говорить, что статья B-класса — это «игровая площадка» для пользователей, — это нормально, но поправлять вас за неоднократные нарушения WP:AGF (и игнорирование установленных фактов) — это личные нападки ?
Хорошо.
Конечно. Отредактировано II ( обсуждение ) 20:16, 4 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
Keep Также не перенаправляйте. Перенаправление на Super Heavy не имеет смысла, учитывая, что несколько элементов на этой странице не могли бы иметь список, составленный из них. В худшем случае, он должен иметь свою собственную страницу устранения неоднозначности, а ссылка SpaceX должна быть сделана «основной темой» для темы. Ergzay ( обсуждение ) 16:48, 2 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответ ]
Уже есть страница псевдо-неоднозначности для Super Heavy . Отредактировано II ( обсуждение ) 17:40, 2 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
@ Ergzay , не уверен, что понимаю твою логику. Ты предлагаешь нам сохранить перенаправление на список SpaceX? Ты сказал: «несколько элементов на этой странице не могли бы иметь список, составленный из них». В Википедии у нас есть список сверхтяжелых элементов ( ссылка ), список сверхтяжелых баков ( ссылка ) и список сверхтяжелых ракетных ускорителей ( ссылка ). Возможно, изменение списка сверхтяжелых элементов на страницу устранения неоднозначности, ссылающуюся на эти списки, будет уместным.
Кроме того, я не вижу в этих списках основной темы, а рейтинги качества статей и количество просмотров, вероятно, в данном случае не имеют значения.
Я определенно собираюсь съесть немного скромного пирога из-за моего комментария о том, что эти обсуждения становятся малопосещаемыми. Командир Кин ( обсуждение ) 22:43, 4 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
@ Commander Keane SpaceX Starship регулярно попадает в заголовки новостей, сверхтяжелые танки и сверхтяжелые элементы — нет. Вот почему я бы назвал это основной темой. И я согласен с «Возможно, изменение Списка сверхтяжелых на страницу устранения неоднозначности, ссылающуюся на эти списки, уместно». Однако я отмечу, что есть связанная страница Список звездолетов , которая ссылается на эквивалентную страницу для верхней ступени, хотя я уверен, что есть тонны других списков звездолетов с различными значениями в других местах в Википедии, у нас она по-прежнему остается в основном основной страницей, даже без каких-либо страниц устранения неоднозначности. Я не уверен, чем отличаются эти два случая. И, наконец, все это подготовка к тому, чтобы превратить ее в отдельную страницу, например, Список ускорителей первой ступени Falcon 9 , когда список станет достаточно длинным, чтобы его разделить. Ergzay ( обсуждение ) 12:07, 5 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
Опять же, страница с неоднозначностью Super Heavy уже есть . И из всех упомянутых здесь статей, SpaceX Super heavy является как самой качественной (B-класса), так и самой просматриваемой, и единственной, имеющей «Высокую важность» для WikiProject.
Перенаправление списка на страницу устранения неоднозначности, которая получает от 1 до 25 просмотров в день (при этом всплески просмотров приходятся на даты Рейса 1 , Рейса 2 , Рейса 3 , Рейса 4 и Рейса 5 ), вообще не имеет смысла.
(Кроме того, я считаю, что список уже достаточно длинный, чтобы превратиться в отдельную страницу, и так было уже некоторое время) Отредактировано II ( обсуждение ) 13:14, 5 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, ✴️Icarus The Astrologer✴️ 09:40, 11 ноября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

Инди ГеройКликс (heroclix)

Неправильное форматирование DAB, указание его как внутри, так и снаружи скобок. Удалить как бесполезное перенаправление. Если оставить, перенаправьте на Список дополнений HeroClix#Основная серия . TNstingray ( обсуждение ) 18:04, 3 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Удалить . Да, действительно, перенесите меня на страницу о герокликсе! Какой именно? Тот, который является герокликсом! Это очень неправдоподобная попытка разрешения неоднозначности, и она нам не нужна. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫𝔫�🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 ( обсуждение ) 04:30, 4 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответ ]
Переместите несущественную историю правок в Indy Clix (судя по поиску Google, это настоящее имя) и перезагрузите в List of HeroClix supplements#Main series, как и предлагалось. — Предыдущий неподписанный комментарий добавлен BOZ ( talk • contribs ) 08:12, 4 ноября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, С уважением, SONIC 678 04:17, 11 ноября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

Милый маленький к

Возможный бессмысленный редирект. Единственное, что я могу разобрать, это то, что переменная — k. Не знаю, что делает ее милой. TeapotsOfDoom ( talk ) 00:47, 11 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Милашка-тян

Кажется, это не распространённое прозвище для неё. TeapotsOfDoom ( обсуждение ) 00:45, 11 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Милашка из класса

Возможный альтернативный перевод? Пока не вижу упоминаний. TeapotsOfDoom ( обсуждение ) 00:45, 11 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

10 ноября

Кэтрин «Кэти» Бринн Купер

Неправдоподобный поисковый запрос из-за '' '' Blethering Scot 22:58, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Австралийский альянс по охране здоровья женщин

Держать Закрытое обсуждение , см. полное обсуждение . Результат: speedy keep

ЛОТАД

Маловероятный поисковый запрос, его следовало бы удалить вместе с демонстрацией с помощью инструмента низкой оптимизации. ~ Eejit43 ( обсуждение ) 22:12, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

это непонятный жаргон. не воображаемый, но все еще непонятный. удалить , с легким предубеждением к перенаправлению на список покемонов 3-го поколения, потому что lotad не заслуживает Caps Lock :c cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 11:38, 11 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Майкл «Севен» Саммерс

Неправдоподобный поисковый запрос из-за использования Seven Blethering Scot 22:09, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Предлагаю не удалять, а оставить редирект, так как в титрах альбомов (в которых Seven (продюсер) принимает непосредственное участие, конечно) он часто указывается как Michael "Seven" Summers. Vanity pimp ( обсуждение ) 22:18, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

2024-25 X²O Badkamers Trophy

удаление. Я ошибочно создал этот редирект, используя неправильное тире в названии: 2024-25. Редирект с правильным тире 2024–25 уже создан. Hg03u ( talk ) 21:53, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Диалекты

Не упомянуто в целевой статье. Blethering Scot 21:18, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Nagasaki Buzzard Attack Chopper (боевой вертолет) (Grand Theft Auto V)

Неправдоподобный перенаправленный поисковый запрос Blethering Scot 20:44, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

VIA Rail Канада

Kanada — это Канада на немецком языке, к которому VIA Rail не имеет никакого отношения . Schützenpanzer (Обсуждение) 20:43, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Радио-Канада

Предыдущие запросы на доставку для этого и похожих перенаправлений:

Вместо этого создайте страницу устранения неоднозначности. Хотя CBC на французском языке называется "Radio-Canada", этот термин на английском языке чаще всего относится к Ici Radio-Canada Télé или Ici Radio-Canada Première , двум его основным вещательным службам. Взгляд на входящие ссылки на Radio-Canada показывает, что почти все они на самом деле предназначены для одной из этих двух статей. 162 и т. д. ( обсуждение ) 20:37, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Планетный террор

Это неправильное написание слова «planet», но по какой-то причине, когда он был создан в 2007 году, он был перенаправлен на текущую цель, а не на Planet Terror (справедливости ради, Planet Terror — один из двух фильмов, показанных в Grindhouse , но все равно не имеет смысла перенаправлять его на страницу о последнем фильме, а не о первом). Ошибка также сомнительна — поиск в Google по этой точной ошибке показывает материалы, связанные с Grindhouse и Terror Planet , но постеры и прочее по-прежнему показывают правильно написанное Pla n et Terror . В такой ситуации я предлагаю либо удалить это перенаправление, либо перенаправить его на Planet Terror , и я хотел бы услышать ваши мысли по этому поводу. С уважением, SONIC 678 20:28, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Planet Terror не получал собственной статьи до 2009 года, поэтому это объясняет, почему вместо этого был сделан редирект на Grindhouse (фильм) . Однако я не вижу никаких веских причин сохранять это. Удалить . 162 и т. д. ( обсуждение ) 02:01, 11 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Кикураге

Не уверен, каков дальнейший путь с этими перенаправлениями. Недавно я изменил цель этих перенаправлений с Tremella fuciformis на Auricularia heimuer (при создании Kikurage ), обнаружив, что большинство результатов на английском языке для термина "Kikurage" относятся к Auricularia heimuer (в частности, его использование в японской кухне), что по сути является WP:PRIMARYTOPIC для этого термина из-за его общего использования в английском языке для обозначения японского кулинарного использования. Однако после просмотра Tremella fuciformis термин "Kikurage" упоминается в статье, что, вероятно, является причиной перенаправлений грибов Kikurage и грибов Kikurage , нацеленных на него. На данный момент я не уверен, является ли "сохранить", "перенацелить" или "устранить неоднозначность" (возможно, перенацелив на Wood ear ?) лучшим способом действия здесь, поэтому я выношу это на обсуждение. Steel1943 ( обсуждение ) 19:47, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Просто из прочтения статей кажется, что перенаправления на Auricularia heimuer верны. Tremella fuciformis — это shiro kikurage (или белый kikurage) на японском языке. Я не думаю, что это просто белая форма kikurage , так как это совсем другие грибы (разные таксономические классы). Мне кажется, что это больше похоже на тигровый и тасманийский тигровый, где последние не являются близкими родственниками кошек. Единственный вопрос в том, можно ли использовать «грибы кикураге» для таких разных грибов, которые используются в кулинарии совершенно по-разному. —  Jts1882 | talk 12:49, 11 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]  

Нил.веселье

Для игр на neal.fun существуют две статьи в Википедии: The Password Game и Infinite Craft . Четкой основной темы нет. Sebbog13 ( обсуждение ) 18:44, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Дэвид Шимански

Я думаю, что Дэвид Шимански не должен быть перенаправлением на Dusk . Он разработал несколько игр, поэтому, вероятно, лучше, чтобы его имя было красной ссылкой, а не перенаправлением на одну конкретную игру. См. WP:RETURNTORED . Di (they-them) ( talk ) 18:36, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Поддержка по имени. Возможно, Ди видел мое сообщение в Discord, где я сказал, что перенаправление должно быть красной ссылкой. Так что я, очевидно, поддерживаю это. - Sebbog13 ( обсуждение ) 18:46, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
вернитесь к красному имени и вставьте сюда реплики большого Джона, cogsan (я здесь) (сделай это, убей меня, давай) 11:40, 11 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
должен упомянуть, что я нашел кое-какие потенциально надежные материалы, но их лучше втиснуть в черновик после того, как этот закончится. результаты, похоже, разрываются между «Dark» и «Iron Light» как его самой популярной игрой, хотя я почти уверен, что мы все знаем, что честь должна принадлежать squirrel stapler cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 11:42, 11 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

РубРуб

Так в шутку называют создателя этой игры участники сообщества, так что это возможно фанкрафт . TeapotsOfDoom ( обсуждение ) 18:36, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Война Звезд

Довольно неправдоподобная опечатка TeapotsOfDoom ( обсуждение ) 18:33, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Удалить - "Stars War" - это турнир по Warcraft , который проводится с 2005 года, поэтому это перенаправление неверно. Хотя это также может быть ошибочным названием для Star Wars, я не думаю, что нацеливание на него правильно, поскольку любой, кто ищет турнир, будет wp:astonished BugGhost 🦗👻 07:41, 11 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Сетевое вещание

В статье TeapotsOfDoom не упоминается ( обсуждение ) 18:30, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Ладонное литье

нет упоминания TeapotsOfDoom ( обсуждение ) 18:28, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Пунч-кастинг

нет упоминания TeapotsOfDoom ( обсуждение ) 18:28, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Хаотолерантность

Никаких упоминаний о "толерантности" или "хаотолерантности" в целевой статье. Похоже на портманто "хаос-толерантности", но без объяснения на целевой странице люди, использующие этот поисковый термин, будут в замешательстве относительно того, что он означает или как он связан с темой, без описания или определения, оправдывающего перенаправление. Utopes ( talk / cont ) 01:13, 26 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Комментарий о перераспределении:Сохранить или мягко перенаправить?
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, CycloneYoris talk! 22:06, 2 ноября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо,asilvering(обсуждение) 15:23, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

Шэнь ан калхар

Как это в итоге перенаправило в WoW? Видимо, это каким-то образом перенаправило не на ту франшизу. Небольшое исследование показывает, что это должно быть из Колеса Времени. При этом там тоже нет упоминания об этом. Похоже, что «Банда Красной Руки» — более распространенное название для этой внутривселенской группы, которая упоминается в статьях. TeapotsOfDoom ( обсуждение ) 21:09, 2 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Перенаправление на Список персонажей Колеса Времени#Mat Cauthon , так как Band of the Red Hand также перенаправляет на него. Procyon117 ( обсуждение ) 14:43, 3 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
Комментарий , при дальнейшем рассмотрении оказывается, что изначально он перенаправлял на правильную франшизу, но был изменен по неизвестной причине. Вероятно, его можно просто вернуть обратно, если вы не против. Procyon117 ( обсуждение ) 14:45, 3 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо,asilvering(обсуждение) 15:21, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

Мир памяти

В целевой статье нет упоминания о "Memory". Как оказалось, весь этот заголовок — это одна буква от существующего перенаправления " Memory word ", и может вводить в заблуждение людей, которые пропускают там букву "L" (что, возможно, согласно Фалькольну ). В любом случае, перенаправление уже вводит в заблуждение, поскольку эта концепция не обсуждается в целевой статье. Utopes ( talk / cont ) 08:09, 2 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

удалить имя до того, как его найдет Тецуя Номура cogsan (nag me) (преследовать меня) 16:46, 2 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Комментарий к повторному перечислению:Все еще удалять? Или мы хотим перенацелиться наСписок глав Yu-Gi-Oh!?
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо,asilvering(обсуждение) 15:17, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

я думаю, что это все еще может быть немного расплывчато, если честно. nyarlathotep запретите кому-либо приводить сюда психонавтов cogsan (пилить меня) (преследовать меня) 11:44, 11 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Корамандал ФК

следует удалить, пока на целевой странице не появится список связанных футбольных клубов. - MPGuy2824 ( обсуждение ) 09:20, 3 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, ✗ plicit 14:09, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

Аяк

Перенацеливание на заголовки и словарь Ку-клукс-клана#Кодовые слова и фразы . Термин «аяк» упоминается только дважды в статье, на которую он в настоящее время указывает, и оба раза не находятся в основных частях статьи. 74.108.22.119 (обсуждение) 13:51, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Андра Геч

Нет упоминания об этом на текущей целевой странице или в долине Хот , изначальной цели. Это может быть деревня в одном из двух мест. - MPGuy2824 ( обсуждение ) 12:27, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Флаг Северного Йемена

Я сделаю это статьей, как и Флаг Южного Йемена — это статья Abo Yemen ✉ 11:18, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Кэндзи Танака

Я думаю, что лучше удалить этот редирект, чем нацеливаться на неправильное написание. Похоже, в реальной жизни он двусмыслен (см. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenji Tanaka (footballer, birth 1983) и Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenji Tanaka (footballer, birth 2001) ). Shhhnotsoloud ( talk ) 09:38, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ reply ]

Lectka энантиоселективный синтез бета-лактама

Верхний редирект ранее был статьей, которая была перенаправлена ​​согласно Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lectka_enantioselective_beta-lactam_synthesis , по-видимому, чтобы сохранить возможность частичного слияния. Но никакого слияния не произошло, и никакой заинтересованности в этом не было выражено, и я не думаю, что есть какой-либо контент, достойный слияния. Нет никаких доказательств того, что это именованная реакция, которая достаточно распространена, чтобы заслуживать упоминания в статье. Удалить все. Mdewman6 ( обсуждение ) 07:37, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответ ]

Джеб Буш о проблемах

Удалить. Страница не имеет истории редактирования, кроме ее создания (как перенаправления) и ее номинации на удаление, и вряд ли использовалась в прошлом или будет полезна в будущем. Поскольку она не соответствует RFD#8, если перенаправление является новым или очень неясным синонимом для названия статьи, которое не упомянуто в цели, оно вряд ли будет полезным , его следует удалить. — Kodiak Blackjack ( обсуждение ) • ( вклад ) 00:33, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответ ]

« Оставаться в стороне» — это общеупотребительная фраза, обозначающая политические взгляды. Примеры для Джеба Буша: [1] [2][3]
Пример для Калама Харрис [4]. Ca Поговори со мной!15:33, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
Придерживайтесь вышеизложенного. Фраза «по вопросам» не «очень непонятна» BugGhost 🦗👻 07:44, 11 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

9 ноября

Уолт Дисней Продакшнс

Я очень рад номинировать это 9-го числа месяца. За всю свою 20-летнюю/2-десятилетнюю историю это название никогда не номинировалось на RFD или для какого-либо обсуждения, поскольку это спорное бывшее дочернее/дивизионное название Disney, в которое влепили WP:STATUSQUO вперемешку. Я призываю либо к установленному индексу, либо к устранению неоднозначности этого названия, как и Fox (канал) / Fox Channel . Intrisit ( обсуждение ) 22:01, 9 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Йоси (персонаж Nintendo)

Неправильное написание вместе с устранением неоднозначности. Не думаю, что это очень правдоподобно. TeapotsOfDoom ( обсуждение ) 20:22, 2 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, CycloneYoris talk! 21:43, 9 ноября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

Англия Львиные Сердца

Mn1548  ( talk  · contribs ) номинировал этот редирект в AfD , но за 18 лет существования это всегда было редирект. Их обоснование следующее:

Не могу найти достаточно ссылок, чтобы сделать это страницей, но очевидно, что это не сборная Англии. Либо нужен более подходящий редирект, либо страницу нужно удалить, поскольку текущий редирект очень вводит в заблуждение.
—  Пользователь:Mn1548 18:50, 9 ноября 2024 (UTC)

Единственный другой комментарий в AfD просто выразил, что это должно было прийти в RfD. У меня нет мнения или комментария относительно достоинств любой потенциальной статьи , но очевидно, что текущее перенаправление бесполезно : раздел, на который оно в настоящее время перенаправляет, и фактически любое упоминание "England Lionhearts" в цели, были удалены в ноябре 2015 года . WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 21:27, 9 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Спасибо, что исправили мою ошибку и поместили это в правильное место для соответствующего обсуждения. Mn1548 ( обсуждение ) 22:00, 9 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Еще один WP:CNR перенаправляет на критерии избранных тем. Это немного похоже на WP:SELF или WP:Clue#Readers . Если обычные читатели хотят посмотреть на контент, который Википедия считает лучшим из лучших, то перенаправления типа Хорошие темы , Избранные темы и Хорошие статьи могут быть полезны, но критерии предназначены для тех, кто хочет понять процесс номинации, то есть не для многих. TeapotsOfDoom ( обсуждение ) 20:58, 9 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответ ]

Удалить по имени. CNR в Википедию: следует использовать только для тем Википедии, которые часто ищут новички. Это не то. Ca Поговори со мной!15:35, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Поскольку хорошие номинации на статьи на самом деле не гарантируют WP:CNR , то будет ли то же самое применяться к кандидатам FT и GT? TeapotsOfDoom ( обсуждение ) 20:44, 9 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответ ]

Удалить по той же причине, что и вышеуказанную номинацию. Ca Поговори со мной!15:36, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Рубен Аморим

Первоначально перенаправлено с Рубена на Рубена в 2012 году с этой редакцией. Сам субъект ранее сегодня заявил, что его имя не имеет знака ударения в интервью (CNN Portugal). Склонен больше полагаться на слово субъекта, а не на непоследовательное написание через источники ФИФА, УЕФА и т. д. SunnyTango ( t • c ) 19:07, 9 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

98 градусов\

Я номинировал это месяц назад, но номинация была удалена Fieari без объяснения причин. Это соответствует Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 30#Various Redirects ending in \ . 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 19:00 , 9 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Сильное, но не быстрое удаление, учитывая результат предыдущего обсуждения. TeapotsOfDoom ( обсуждение ) 21:10, 9 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
Я удалил его? Если так, то это было совершенно непреднамеренно... может быть, конфликт редактирования? У меня также иногда возникали странные проблемы, когда я нажимал кнопку редактирования раздела, а в редакторе появлялся совершенно другой раздел, так что иногда я сталкиваюсь с некоторой странностью, и из-за этого могут происходить несчастные случаи. Если я намеренно удаляю что-то, я никогда не делаю этого без, по крайней мере, резюме редактирования. У меня вообще нет воспоминаний об этой конкретной номинации. (Пока я здесь, могу также добавить, что у меня нет возражений против удаления этого перенаправления) Fieari ( обсуждение ) 03:23, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответ ]

Пробуждение драконов

Вводящий в заблуждение редирект, "пробуждение драконов" не является концепцией, обсуждаемой в целевой общей статье для Yugioh. "Пробуждение", как и "драконы", упоминаются в целевой статье.

Если нет существующего местоположения Yugioh, на которое это может указать, в попытке WP:ATD , это можно легко перенацелить на Waking the Dragon , которая является существующей статьей, и в строке поиска наличие двух в противном случае сбивало бы с толку. Я номинирую здесь вместо того, чтобы смело перенацеливаться, потому что я немного в ударе, и могут быть общие темы, если это все «дуги» Yugioh, как они кажутся, поэтому лучше перечислить их все здесь для уверенности и последовательности. Utopes ( обсуждение / продолжение ) 08:12, 2 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответ ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, CycloneYoris talk! 18:53, 9 ноября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

Ультраджектин

Выражение нигде не используется в статьях, поэтому это WP:RSURPRISE . Название "Церковь Утрехта (Ультраектная церковь)" ранее присутствовало в Union of Utrecht (Old Catholic) , но было удалено в 2023 году, поскольку не было поддержано ни одним источником.

«Ultrajectine» — псевдолатинское прилагательное, которое просто означает «Утрехтский» (см.: wikt:Ultraiectinus), и я не нашел ни одного случая использования этого псевдолатинского слова для обозначения города Утрехт .

Поэтому я предлагаю удалить . Veverve ( обсуждение ) 10:29, 2 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, CycloneYoris talk! 18:53, 9 ноября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

Тони ДиДжероламо

Нет упоминаний на странице; также как и в списке комиксов The Simpsons . Эта удаленная страница о писателе комиксов перенаправляет сюда, хотя, вероятно, она предназначена для страницы о разделе комиксов франшизы, поскольку она содержит контент о серии комиксов с тем же названием, что и текущая цель. Xeroctic ( обсуждение ) 18:18, 2 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, CycloneYoris talk! 18:52, 9 ноября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

Мохаммед Джафар

Не упомянуто в статье. Если поискать, то это, похоже, очень кратко используемый фальшивый псевдоним в эпизоде ​​« Свадьба Лизы» (эта сцена происходит в предсказанном будущем и, следовательно, не является частью непрерывности «Симпсонов»). Xeroctic ( обсуждение ) 11:55, 9 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

3.1415926535…

Удалить. Это было создано несколько месяцев назад. Это просто максимальное количество цифр, которое Википедия допускает для заголовка страницы. Это неразумный поисковый запрос, и я бы сказал, что он не соответствует правилу № 8 WP:RFD#DELETE : будучи новым или малоизвестным синонимом, который вряд ли будет полезен. Краткое изложение правок для его создания, которое гласит «255 (максимальное) количество символов. Лол.», также заставляет меня задуматься, не было ли это шуткой (у этого пользователя было что-то вроде «одержимости» ограничением в 255 символов, сравните этот пример ). Renerpho ( обсуждение ) 04:47, 13 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Сохранить Некоторые читатели могут наткнуться на очень длинную серию цифр и не понять, что это число Пи, поэтому они будут искать его, обрезая по мере необходимости. Ca Поговори со мной!15:35, 13 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
И где тут "усечение по мере необходимости" ровно на 255 цифрах? Усечение на 256 цифрах приведет к ошибке, а усечение на 254 цифрах приведет к перенаправлению, которого не существует. Renerpho ( talk ) 17:18, 14 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
Это не для набора текста, это для копирования и переноса. Если вы вставите 255+ цифр числа Пи в Википедию, оно обрежется до этого перенаправления. -- T avix ( обсуждение ) 01:40, 14 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
AFAIK, поисковые системы работают не так. Если ввести больше, чем это точное число цифр, поисковые системы не будут обрезать токен до наших 256 символов и не будут указывать на нашу статью (попробуйте Google). Если поиск выполняется внутри Википедии, длинная подсказка будет работать и выдавать предложение Pi без этого перенаправления (перенаправление будет на самом деле сбивать с толку, поскольку будет отвлекать внимание от фактической статьи). Викидим ( talk ) 06:50, 14 октября 2024 (UTC) [ reply ]
Вопрос от номинатора : Тем, кто выступает за сохранение, вы говорите, что нам следует сделать перенаправление со всех других возможных длин? Вы понимаете, что это противоречит большинству предыдущих обсуждений, касающихся перенаправлений на усеченные версии числа пи? У нас есть некоторые, например, все до 3,14159265358979323846264338 , но большинство других — включая некоторые, например, 3,14159265358979323846264338327950, который на самом деле упоминается в другой статье и может быть полезным поисковым термином, но был удален согласно R3: Недавно созданный, неправдоподобный перенаправление — отсутствуют. См. также это старое обсуждение удаления и это . Я уверен, что есть и другие; оба они привели к удалению нескольких похожих перенаправлений по той же причине и приведены в качестве примеров.
Если этот аргумент не работает, то у нас должно быть 255 различных перенаправлений, по одному для каждого возможного усечения, плюс примечание на странице политики о том, что такие перенаправления считаются полезными для обсуждения в сообществе. Renerpho ( обсуждение ) 13:55, 14 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответ ]
Исправление: на самом деле все до 3,1415926535897932384626433832795.
(Оно также было номинировано на удаление , но было сохранено, поскольку 32-значная версия была полезна для плавающей запятой, о которой вы упомянули. Думаю, дополнительный 0 был слишком большим.)
Не уверен, есть ли аналогичный вариант использования для 255 цифр.) ApexParagon ( обсуждение ) 16:18, 14 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответ ]
Нет, 3.14159265358979323846264338327 не существует с 2011 года, а 3.1415926535897932384626433832 был удален в 2015 году. Renerpho ( обсуждение ) 16:37, 14 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
Последнее, конечно, отличается от других, потому что это была статья, а не перенаправление. Она была удалена в соответствии с A7 ( Статья о веб-сайте, блоге, веб-форуме, веб-комиксе, подкасте, браузерной игре или подобном веб-контенте, который достоверно не указывает на важность или значимость темы ), что является причиной, по которой я бы не подумал об этом. Можно было бы поспорить, следовало ли превратить ее в перенаправление в то время. Я бы сказал нет, по тем же причинам, по которым следует удалить другие, но вы могли бы . Renerpho ( обсуждение ) 16:49, 14 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
Из этого не следует, что если мы не удаляем перенаправление определенного характера, то мы должны создавать другие такого же характера или даже поощрять или даже не препятствовать таким созданиям. В статьях эти три линии настолько близки, что для большинства людей и большинства целей они сливаются в одну. Перенаправления отличаются тем, что они могут быть безвредными, они не рекламируют свое присутствие, как статьи, и они очень дешевы во всех ресурсах, особенно в ресурсах редактора (если только их не номинируют на удаление). Всего наилучшего: Rich Farmbrough 20:51, 18 октября 2024 (UTC).[ отвечать ]
Оставьте - это, очевидно, правильная цель, и это правдоподобное перенаправление (кто-то, кто видит, что число пи записано таким образом, и копирует столько, сколько позволяет Википедия в строке поиска). Остановитесь и подумайте: «реалистично, если пользователь ввел это в строку поиска и нажал Enter, куда он должен пойти?» Неужели избиратели за удаление серьезно думают, что страница «0 результатов поиска» является лучшей целью для этого, чем Пи ? BugGhost 🦗👻 23:45, 14 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
Это аргумент соломенного чучела, потому что "0 результатов поиска" — это не то, о чем идет речь. Вы на самом деле пробовали? Если пользователь копирует/вставляет 254 цифры, перенаправление ему не поможет, но автозаполнение выдает ему Пи, даже если мы удалим перенаправление (они всегда получают автозаполнение до 3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751 , что не вызывает сомнений). А если они копируют/вставляют 256 или больше (что они, безусловно, могут сделать), они также получат автозаполнение для Пи — если только они на самом деле не нажмут поиск, в этом случае они получат сообщение об ошибке. Ни в одном из этих случаев перенаправление не поможет. Renerpho ( talk ) 00:48, 15 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
Поправка (признаю, что я был недостаточно внимателен, когда сам это проверял): если вы ищете от 256 до 300 цифр, вы просто ничего не найдете (ни текущее перенаправление, ни Pi). Только когда вы вводите 301 или более цифр, вы получаете сообщение об ошибке. Сравните H:S и WP:TITLELENGTH . Renerpho ( talk ) 11:05, 18 октября 2024 (UTC) [ reply ]
Удалить . Хотя 255 символов могут быть пределом, я считаю маловероятным, что кто-то собирается вводить все 255 символов (или даже копировать и вставлять 255 символов; откуда они вообще возьмут 255 символов? Я бы поспорил за сохранение, если бы ограничение строки поиска составляло 255 символов, но это не так). Procyon117 ( обсуждение ) 10:20, 18 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
А каков лимит строки поиска? (300, а не 255; 255, я думаю, это лимит длины заголовков статей.) Renerpho ( обс .) 10:33, 18 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
Не оставляйте абсолютно никаких политических причин для удаления. Это ни в коем случае не ново и не непонятно. Это очень дешевый способ доставить людей в нужное место по сравнению со стоимостью обсуждения этого вопроса. Всего наилучшего: Rich Farmbrough 20:44, 18 октября 2024 (UTC).[ отвечать ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, Cremastra (u—c) 19:41, 20 октября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

Удалить . Перенаправления дешевы, но это просто неправдоподобно. TeapotsOfDoom ( обсуждение ) 20:48, 20 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
Сохраняйте , безвредный и точный ‹ hamster717🐉 › ( обсуждайте что угодно!🐹✈️ • мой вклад🌌🌠 ) 15:45, 23 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
@ Hamster717 , большинство редакторов просят удалить длинное число с точки зрения приближения, равного числу пи. Но можете ли вы пояснить свое доказательство? Кажется, что WP:CHEAP не рекомендуется, так как безвреден. ✴️Icarus The Astrologer✴️ 11:32, 24 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Комментарий к повторному размещению:Окончательный повторный заказ. Удалить или сохранить?
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, CycloneYoris talk! 07:03, 9 ноября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

Кандидаты на избранные статьи

Процесс не упоминается в статье. QuicoleJR ( обсуждение ) 17:56, 1 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

я имею в виду... wp:fanom тут как тут... все равно проголосую за слабое удаление , как "не на правдоподобной стороне xnrs" cogsan (пилите меня) (преследуйте меня) 18:50, 1 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Комментарий о переиздании:Удалить или перенацелить?
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, CycloneYoris talk! 06:52, 9 ноября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

Рецессия конца нулевых

Неоднозначно с Panic of 1907 и, возможно, Panic of 1901 (в зависимости от определения слова «поздно»), поскольку перенаправление не проясняет, к какому столетию оно относится. Удалить. Steel1943 ( обсуждение ) 16:53, 1 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, CycloneYoris talk! 06:51, 9 ноября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

Хаскелл Харр

Держать Закрытое обсуждение , см. полное обсуждение . Результат: сохранить

Клэр Миллер

Это вымышленный персонаж из фильма 2008 года — не вижу смысла в переадресации и путаю с другой Клэр Миллер (без артикля пока). Laterthanyouthink ( обсуждение ) 05:48, 2 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Комментарий о перераспределении:Мысли о перенаправлении наКлэр Рочестер?
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, CycloneYoris talk! 06:44, 9 ноября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

Президент Испании

Устранить неоднозначность . Я не понимаю, почему историческая роль должна иметь приоритет над этим термином, а не над нынешней должностью главы правительства ( премьер-министр Испании ), официально именуемой «президентом». — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung , mello hi! ( До свидания! ) 05:36, 9 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Асмодель

Это было скрыто Quindraco . Когда я провел расследование, я понял, почему. «Asmodel» был удален из списка персонажей DC Comics: A , тем самым нарушив перенаправление. Это было, если бы Asmodel, который, по-видимому, является десятифутовым ангелом/дьяволом, просто исчез из существования. Я представляю, что это было бы трудно сделать любому десятифутовому существу. Я мечтаю о лошадях (Следы копыт) (Ржание на меня) 04:28, 9 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Шаблон:Пожалуйста, прекратите движение

От редактора, создавшего WPT:NFCC , я думаю, что единственные пользователи, которые будут использовать перенаправление шаблона, — это редакторы, которые используют шаблоны, и они будут более чем знакомы со своими именами, а не с фразой «Пожалуйста, прекратите двигаться». Это могло бы быть приемлемым, если бы это было обращено к читателям, но большинство читателей не знают о существовании шаблонов, не говоря уже о том, чтобы искать какой-то конкретный. L iz Читать! Говорить! 01:41, 9 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

После публикации этого сообщения я получил красное оповещение об этой записи, поскольку она включала перенаправление шаблона. Но я думаю, что это обсуждение должно происходить здесь, а не на TFD. L iz Читать! Обсуждать! 01:43, 9 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

КитайФайл

В целевой статье нет упоминания о "файле". Был создан с редактированием резюме "веб-сайт", но это не учтено в целевой статье. Веб-сайт, который указан для Asia Society, - asiasociety.org. Без какого-либо контекста это перенаправление бесполезно и вводит в заблуждение, поскольку людям, которые ищут этот термин, не предоставляется контекст, почему они оказались здесь. Может быть, читатель искал файл о Китае? В настоящее время ответов нет. Utopes ( обсуждение / продолжение ) 01:08, 26 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

ChinaFile — это интернет-журнал, издаваемый Азиатским обществом. (См. https://asiasociety.org/center-us-china-relations/chinafile) W9793 ( обсуждение ) 03:29, 26 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
Журнал сейчас упоминается в начале, но, вероятно, было бы полезно предоставить дополнительный контекст позже в статье, возможно, в разделе «Функции». Recon rabbit 22:02, 26 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Комментарий к повторному перечислению:Повторное перечисление. Влияет ли упоминание в статье на эту номинацию?
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, L iz Читать! Обсуждать! 01:16, 2 ноября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

Сохранить. Упоминания в статье достаточно для поддержки перенаправления; хотя некоторая дополнительная информация о ChinaFile может быть полезной, насколько мы здесь, в RfD, это правильная цель. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫𝔙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 ( обсуждение ) 06:26, 2 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответ ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, L iz Read! Talk! 00:29, 9 ноября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

Следуйте WP :HEY . -1ctinus📝 🗨 00:44, 9 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

8 ноября

Фпун

Это терминология, которая была создана в первую очередь из скетча Key & Peele . Поиск "fpoon" выводит исключительно видео, связанные с K&P, и городской словарь, цитирующий их. Хотя это может быть портманто "fork" и "spoon", это не широко принятый или цитируемый синоним, и не упоминается в цели. Распространенное и не вызывающее путаницы название для этого предмета - "spork"; отсутствие просмотров страниц указывает на то, что "fpoon" может быть новым и малоизвестным синонимом для предмета и, вероятно, запутает читателей. Тем более, что "fpoon" не является настоящим словом или особенно грамматически правильным. Люди, которые используют этот термин, вполне могут искать скетч K&P о континентальном завтраке, lol. Utopes ( talk / cont ) 08:18, 28 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, Джей 💬 00:06, 9 ноября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

Кладбище Байрона

Это была статья о кладбище. Кто-то посчитал его непримечательным, поэтому перенаправил его в город, в котором оно находилось. Однако затем было указано, что существует (вероятно) несколько кладбищ Байрона. Как есть, мы нацеливаем это на страницу DAB, на которой не упоминаются кладбища. PARAKANYAA ( обсуждение ) 07:55, 31 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Восстановите статью и отправьте ее в AfD, чтобы посмотреть, будет ли эта тема значимой. -1ctinus📝 🗨 12:31, 31 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
удалить . Примерно полчаса поисков дали мне общественное кладбище Байрон... но также и другие кладбища в местах с названием Байрон, другие кладбища с названием Байрон, людей, которые превратились в трупы и были похоронены на одном из этих кладбищ, и людей, которые откинули копыта, будучи названными Байрон. Ни один из результатов не показался мне надежным для статьи, и ни одно кладбище не получило больше 2 результатов (которые не были некрологами, конечно). Самым близким к известному "кладбищу Байрон" было кладбище и мавзолей Байрон в Фэрборне, штат Огайо , но даже в этом случае это конкретное кладбище не упоминается в статье о городе, и я все еще не нашел о нем ничего надежного . Все это говорит о том, что, по моему мнению, недостаточно информации для работы над мазком
меньше предубеждений против afd, чем обычно, учитывая, что это не было перенаправлением с тех пор, как Anthem был в разработке cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 16:31, 31 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, Джей 💬 23:41, 8 ноября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

Руководство по стилю:

Если бы это было реальное пространство имен, я почти уверен, что оно было бы пустым. Почти уверен, что большинство просто использовали бы WP:MOS . Даже ввод MOS: без чего-либо перед ним все равно приведет вас туда, куда вы хотите. TeapotsOfDoom ( talk ) 19:50, 1 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

если перенацелить, это, вероятно, станет неправдоподобным двоеточием. если не перенацелить, это будет преступлением против клавиши Shift. удалить per nom cogsan (nag me) (преследовать меня) 20:50, 1 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, ✗ plicit 23:32, 8 ноября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

Биби-мясник

Хотя это «прозвище» и было распространено в социальных сетях, я не думаю, что оно подходит для Википедии. Significa liberdade (она/её) ( обсуждение ) 20:17, 1 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, ✗ plicit 23:31, 8 ноября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

Википедия:Ретаргет

Разве это не должно быть в Wikipedia:Redirect ? Думаю, нам нужно перенацелить ретаргетинг. При этом есть основания для сохранения, если WP:RfD объясняет ретаргетинг лучше, чем предыдущий. TeapotsOfDoom ( обсуждение ) 20:24, 1 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Комментарий : Это очень странно, и я только что понял, что Wikipedia:Redirect , похоже, не содержит четкого раздела или набора инструкций о том, как перенаправить существующий редирект. Слова «перенаправить» и «изменить» упоминаются несколько раз, но не в контексте, в котором читатель, ищущий этот редирект, был бы удовлетворен отрывком, где эти слова упоминаются. Steel1943 ( обсуждение ) 20:54, 1 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
Справедливости ради, если вы знаете, как создать перенаправление, вы, вероятно, сможете понять, как его перенацелить. Вы просто меняете целевую страницу в скобках на нужную вам.
Вероятно, не нужно больше 2-3 предложений, чтобы объяснить. ApexParagon ( обсуждение ) 05:01, 8 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, ✗ plicit 23:31, 8 ноября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

Хорошие статьи на Википедии

Просто проверяю, изменился ли консенсус по GA WP:XNR . Этот был создан совсем недавно. TeapotsOfDoom ( обсуждение ) 20:31, 1 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Комментарий к повторному размещению:Мысли о ретаргетинге?
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, ✗ plicit 23:30, 8 ноября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

ОФМ Сайкс

Не упоминается в целевой статье. Потенциально непримечательно. Blethering Scot 22:18, 1 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Сохранить . Он первоклассный игрок в крикет, который играет за Суррей, [8], так что цель подходящая. Он, возможно, пока недостаточно известен для своей страницы, но его все равно можно добавить в список (некоторые люди в списке не имеют страниц), и, учитывая, что ему всего 19, он вполне может быть достаточно известен для страницы в ближайшее время. – Майкл Аурел ( обсуждение ) 23:21, 8 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, ✗ plicit 23:30, 8 ноября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

Марципановая радость

Больше не упоминается в статье, несмотря на объединение страниц. Xeroctic ( обсуждение ) 15:14, 1 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответ ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Перечисление комментария:Мысли об истории страницы?
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, ✗ plicit 23:29, 8 ноября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

Великая депрессия на Ближнем Востоке

Раздела «Target» не существует, и в статье «Target» нет достаточной информации, чтобы уточнить это перенаправление таким образом, чтобы гарантировать, что читатели найдут то, что они ищут. Steel1943 ( обсуждение ) 18:31, 1 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

@ Steel1943 : В этом разделе объясняется, что Великая депрессия оказала серьезное влияние на страны Ближнего Востока, а также описываются ее последствия для Персии и Турции .
Если бы эта страница перенаправления была удалена, читатели могли бы решить, что эта тема слишком неважна, чтобы писать о ней статью или раздел. Jarble ( обсуждение ) 23:38, 1 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
Напротив; если бы это была красная ссылка, это бы дало редакторам понять, что статья на эту тему еще не написана и может быть написана . Хотя мы не можем знать наверняка, что подумает читатель, неизбежно, что Википедия находится в процессе разработки . Гортензии ( она/ее | обсуждение | редактирование ) 19:57, 2 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, ✗ plicit 23:28, 8 ноября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

Еврейский погром в Амстердаме

Холокост в Нидерландах , где произошли настоящие погромы, — лучшая цель, чем WP:RECENT стычка футбольных хулиганов. Малл ( обсуждение ) 16:08, 8 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Когда я был начинающим специалистом по устранению неоднозначностей, я наткнулся на неоднозначную ссылку на одно место в современной Беларуси. Я ее идентифицировал.
Следующая проблема была идентична. Я решил и ее.
Третья задача была такой же, и я ее тоже решил.
В этот момент я сделал перерыв, потому что по какой-то причине не мог как следует сосредоточиться и неконтролируемо ругался. Одно из этих трех мест, уничтоженных в начале 1940-х годов, отмечено высеченным на земле камнем. Два других — нет.
Назвать недавний инцидент в Амстердаме «погромом» — это оскорбление всех тех, кто стал жертвой настоящих погромов. Кстати, у меня нет еврейских корней. Narky Blert ( обсуждение ) 15:41, 9 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Мург

создано как «урду для „курица“», но, по-видимому, используется только в контексте индийского карри и, похоже, не упоминается за пределами истории страницы, предыдущего обсуждения и butter chicken . см. также murg i think cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 16:34, 2 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, CycloneYoris talk! 07:10, 10 октября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

В качестве альтернативы, перенацельтесь на Афганская кухня#Курица , где это обсуждается как афганский термин. Utopes ( обсуждение / продолжение ) 09:18, 18 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
Я отмечу, что любой, кто ищет индийскую кухню, будет WP:УДИВЛЕН целью афганской кухни, так что это тоже может быть плохой целью. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫𝔫�🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 ( обсуждение ) 00:18, 20 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответ ]
Вы не можете просто сказать: «Кто-то ищет тему, которую мы не освещаем в Википедии, будет WP:удивлен, если он окажется на теме, которую мы освещаем в Википедии». Это совсем не рассматривается в эссе, на которое вы ссылаетесь, в котором говорится: «Среднестатистический читатель не должен быть шокирован, удивлен или сбит с толку тем, что он читает». Никто не будет шокирован, если он введет в поиск слово «murgh» и увидит единственное место, где тема «murgh» напрямую определена и обсуждается в Википедии (например, в афганской кухне). Было бы по-другому, если бы не было никакого упоминания об афганцах, но оно есть.
Мы исходим из того, что у нас есть , а не из того, что мы хотим, но не имеем. Если бы индийская кухня была так важна, кто-то бы добавил что-то, связанное с этой темой, в Википедию, в любой момент времени за последние два десятилетия или в ходе обсуждения. Или в будущем! Когда что-то добавляется для этого контента об индийской кухне, термин может быть устранен и могут быть созданы новые перенаправления. (Если только в настоящее время НЕТ существующего контента, связанного с индийским мургом, но никто, похоже, не утверждает, что это правда. Я не нашел ничего, что обсуждало бы индийскую терминологию, в Википедии.) Utopes ( обсуждение / продолжение ) 21:23, 25 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответ ]
За исключением того, что вы сами уже ссылались на статьи, в которых обсуждаются отдельные блюда индийской кухни мург, курица в масле и чана масала (которая является целью мург чолай ). Добавьте к этому мург мусаллам и цыпленка тандури , которые — хотя в настоящее время нет перенаправления на «мург», его собственная статья и статья для индийской кухни#Пенджаб описывают его как таковой. Очевидно, что сами по себе отдельные блюда достойны иметь свои собственные статьи, на которые можно было бы ссылаться при устранении неоднозначности, поэтому я, честно говоря, лично шокирован тем, что сам индийский мург НИКОГДА не обсуждался. Может быть, мы просто еще не нашли его? 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫𝔙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 ( обсуждение ) 23:40, 25 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
Согласен, что существуют индийские темы, такие как Murgh musallam и Murgh cholay . Однако к ним можно перейти, введя полное название соответствующих блюд. Не имеет смысла отправлять Murgh в одну или любую из них, как частичное совпадение названий . Поэтому удаление также включено в меню, каламбур. :v Кстати, ни "murgh", ни "cholay" не упоминаются в Chana masala , так что, возможно, его тоже следует номинировать.
Теперь, когда я знаю об афганском термине, который является единственным местом, где этот термин обсуждается в Википедии, я менее настроен на удаление, и поэтому должен по умолчанию указать цель. Допустимо, чтобы слово "murgh", как оно используется в murgh musallam , имело иное происхождение, чем цель "murgh", как оно используется в Afghan kitchen#Chicken , которая даже там указана как "murgh-e", но все равно лучше, чем вообще ничего.
На основании доказательств, представленных читателям в основном пространстве Википедии, только афганская кухня может быть основной темой "murgh", на основании того, что это ЕДИНСТВЕННАЯ тема, охватываемая (отдельно) в Википедии (как это имеет место, пока я пишу это). Я также против примечания, особенно если это перенаправление указывает на афганскую кухню. Что вообще может быть сказано в примечании? "Murgh перенаправляет сюда. Для термина, используемого как индийская кухня, пожалуйста, рассмотрите курицу как еду , которая не содержит никакой информации, которую вы ищете о 'Murgh как индийская кухня'" ? Может быть, на этом этапе мы могли бы просто устранить неоднозначность чего- то? Но было бы довольно сложно оправдать устранение неоднозначности списка пищевых WP:PTMs , которые такие PTMs не должны быть перечислены в dabs, но я отвлекся... Utopes ( обсуждение / продолжение ) 02:23, 26 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответ ]
Также относительно последнего предложения, это было номинировано с 2 октября. Все !keepers хотели сохранить, несмотря на то, что оно не упоминалось в Chicken as food или других предложениях, где "murgh" также не упоминалось. Никаких доказательств использования индийского термина "murgh" не было опубликовано за пределами Викисловаря. Теперь мы ищем индийские использования "murgh" на Вики, только когда был обнаружен афганский термин? Я сам провел довольно большой поиск и ничего не нашел, но лучшая часть заключается в том, что если позже будет найдено упоминание индийского термина, перенаправление может быть перенаправлено и/или воссоздано после обнаружения таких доказательств, что даже не обязательно должно произойти на этой неделе или в этом месяце. Но в то же время мы знаем то, что знаем, и то, что я знаю, это то, что он упоминается в Afghan kitchen . Utopes ( обсуждение / продолжение ) 02:37, 26 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо,Cremastra— talk — c 20:11, 18 октября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

Перечислено повторно для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, L iz Read! Talk! 23:42, 26 октября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

Повторно размещено для более тщательного обсуждения и более четкого консенсуса.
Комментарий к повторному размещению:Еще одна попытка, пожалуйста. Удалить, сохранить или перенацелить? Поскольку нет обновления соглашения.
Пожалуйста, добавьте новые комментарии под этим уведомлением. Спасибо, ✴️Icarus The Astrologer✴️ 13:19, 8 ноября 2024 (UTC)[ отвечать ]

Рыльце

Больше не упоминается в целевой теме (см. историю там, чтобы узнать, почему я удалил его). Первоначально был создан в другом месте, где также нет упоминания. Есть один на WP, но он просто указывает на озвучку, по-видимому, второстепенного персонажа (без источника) в еще не выпущенном фильме и не нуждается в перенаправлении. 35.139.154.158 ( обсуждение ) 13:07, 8 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Перенацельтесь обратно на Mario & Luigi: Brothership . Это буквально главный персонаж в сюжете игры, и игра только что вышла, так что пока не будет краткого содержания сюжета. Он определенно получит упоминание, как только редакторы сделают обзор сюжета. TeapotsOfDoom ( обсуждение ) 23:35, 8 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
Обновление : на странице теперь есть краткое содержание сюжета , в котором упоминается Snoutlet . TeapotsOfDoom ( обсуждение ) 19:08, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Блич (игры)

Древние перенаправления, которые не являются заметными синонимами для этой статьи и не используются ни в одной статье за ​​последние 18 лет. Следует удалить. Для первого перенаправления история правок также не примечательна, так как было сделано всего два редактирования, и оба были перемещениями. Два других были созданы как перенаправления и фактически никогда не использовались. MimirIsSmart (обсуждение) 11:30, 8 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Википедия:STAYONTOPIC

Я думаю, что это перенаправление должно быть перенаправлено туда, куда ведут WP:TOPIC и WP:OFFTOPIC , то есть на Wikipedia:Writing better articles#Stay on topic .

Между тем, я добавил небольшую заметку. Veverve ( talk ) 09:54, 8 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

EDIT: Я поддерживаю устранение неоднозначности как второй вариант, как утверждают редакторы ниже. Veverve ( обсуждение ) 16:47, 10 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

тайский

Отбросив любые аргументы Пандоры , я не думаю, что это правдоподобная опечатка. TeapotsOfDoom ( обсуждение ) 07:30, 8 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответ ]

Фортнит

Отбросив любые аргументы Пандоры , я не думаю, что это правдоподобная опечатка. TeapotsOfDoom ( обсуждение ) 07:30, 8 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответ ]

удалить по имени возможно даже двусмысленно с fortnight cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:06, 8 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Спутник (поисковая система)

Delete Закрытое обсуждение , см. полное обсуждение . Результат: быстрое удаление

Мотра Лео

Mothra Leo — это фанатское имя, и это просто слух, кроме того, если это трилогия возрождения, Mothra должна называться «MOTHRA», а не Leo, в противном случае Toho следовало бы изменить название трилогии на «Birth of Mothra Leo». 121.45.246.200 (обсуждение) 07:19, 8 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

GojiraFan1954 ( обсуждение ) 07:29, 8 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Банорант

Видимо, кто-то пометил это как опечатку. Это явно фанкрафт . TeapotsOfDoom ( обсуждение ) 07:19, 8 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

удалить как неправдоподобный, но что еще важнее, как плохой каламбур cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:14, 8 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Еврейские погромы в Амстердаме

Это перенаправление не ведет к погрому -- haminoon ( обсуждение ) 06:19, 8 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Привет. Я вижу, что вы зарегистрировались сегодня, и единственное изменение, которое вы сделали, было на этой странице. Не могли бы вы пояснить свою точку зрения? С уважением, Олег Ю. ( обсуждение ) 14:18, 8 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
  1. «Джерузалем пост» (1, 2, 3, 4)
  2. The Times of Israel (1, 2, 3, 4)
  3. Рейтер (1 - цитата)
  4. JSN (1)
  5. New York Post ] (1 - цитата)
  6. Нью-Йорк Сан (1, 2)
  7. Би-би-си (1, 2, 3)
  8. Израиль Хайом (1)
  9. Аруц Шева (1, 2)
  10. Еврейская хроника (1)
  11. Зритель (1)
  12. Форвард (1)
  13. Инет (1)
  14. Еврейская пресса (1)
  15. Ньюсмакс (1, 2)
  16. Законное восстание (1)
  17. Ратуша (1)
  18. Израиль сегодня (1)
  19. И многое другое.
С уважением, Олег Ю. ( обсуждение ) 14:18, 8 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]
Smallangryplanet ( обсуждение ) 16:51, 8 ноября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

NJHS

Disambiguate Закрытое обсуждение , см. полное обсуждение . Результат: NJHS (неоднозначность) вернулся в NJHS

2029 в космическом полете

Delete Закрытое обсуждение , см. полное обсуждение . Результат: удалить

Симулятор шляпы

Возможный WP:FANCRUFT TeapotsOfDoom ( обсуждение ) 21:19, 31 октября 2024 (UTC) [ ответить ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:39, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PKS 0451-28

This is a part of the target list, but it is one of 8000 and isn't mentioned as one of the notable ones there. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:10, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 22:13, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:37, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tesonet

Delete to encourage creation of the article. High trafic redirect with the only fact present being the year of establishment. Respublik (talk) 16:50, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 22:16, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:37, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Human Aquarium

It doesn't seem that "The Human Aquarium" is more likely to refer to Hadji Ali than to Mac Norton, whose article mentions the nickname in the lead, while Ali's only mentions the name six paragraphs down. Paul_012 (talk) 19:42, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:35, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DQw4w9WgXcQ

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy keep

IRAS 13349+1428

Not mentioned in the target page and unable to find anything on Google. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:58, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: See above for an explanation why this redirect exists. Do you still think it should be deleted? Renerpho (talk) 10:48, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think waiting for inputs from a couple of more editors will not hurt. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@MPGuy2824: I am asking because this discussion is now eight days old -- one day over the usual deadline. We could close it, rather than waiting for someone to relist it, if all the arguments have been heard. I take that to mean you still think there's more to discuss? Renerpho (talk) 11:14, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This decision should not be left to a person with my level of astronomy knowledge. Like I said, waiting a week or two more will not hurt since "no consensus" is equivalent to "keep". -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:25, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 19:12, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Pretty sure that's a typo, and typoes like this shouldn't be redirects. Procyon117 (talk) 14:06, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. This is looking like a No consensus situation.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:18, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I voted delete above in a reply to an argument, so I want to make a record of it here, after the relist, since that's when my comment was made. Don't double-count my !vote. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 07:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Putting wedge

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Over two years later, let's try this again: delete per WP:RSURPRISE as unmentioned and per WP:REDLINK per my comments in the previous discussion's nomination statement. Steel1943 (talk) 17:46, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:15, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ape Escape Racer

An extremely novel misnomer of an unofficial translated name of a Japan-only game. Is orphaned, which makes its unnecessary existence even less meaningful. MimirIsSmart (talk) 14:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:13, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stone Jesus

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Jimboboii

This seems to be one of the social media usernames of the perpetrator. Not mentioned in the target page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 01:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. In addition to not being mentioned, it is misspelled from what he used. Extra useless. PARAKANYAA (talk) 09:54, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lanyard class

I have been unable to find sources that describe the Professional–managerial class as the "lanyard class", which could also refer to other class groups. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:42, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The phrases are used as synonyms in the Niskanen Center piece I linked in the edit summary:
Graeber suggests that the electoral collapse of social-democratic and worker’s parties in Europe is a result of a “revolt of the caring classes” against the “proceduralism” of the “professional-managerial class” for whom “rules and regulations, flow charts, quality reviews, audits and PowerPoints that form the main substance of their working life inevitably color their view of politics or even morality.” [...] Warren’s “I have a plan for that!” slogan appeals mainly to the PowerPoint masters of the lanyard class, not the people who have to navigate the byzantine maze of their oversight.
and also in the Telegraph:
...managerial class getting tax perks to feel good in their shiny new electric vehicles, while the manual classes... It’s the lanyard-wearing boss class who are enjoying the perks of subsidised electric vehicles...
PK-WIKI (talk) 21:40, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 7

Wikipedia:OPENLETTER

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

History of the United States (2008–2024)

This redirect is the result of a bad page move but I don't think any CSD criteria applies to it. It is the result of an editor writing a new article that states that 2024 ushered a new era into American history. The article has now been moved to Draft space. Liz Read! Talk! 21:11, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Who would be using this as a search term? Is it generally considered that American history ended in 2024? Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mongola

possible implausible misspelling TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 18:40, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Waliugi

possible implausible misspelling TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 18:40, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. waaaa cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Counrty

possible implausible misspelling TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 18:40, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete. possibly also ambiguous with county cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:06, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kentuchy

possible implausible misspelling TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 18:40, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reccomend

Ok this misspelling has like two errors. I don't think that's very plausible. TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 18:39, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gardern

possible implausible misspelling TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 18:38, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stephoscope

possible implausible misspelling TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 18:37, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Monterrey La Raza (current)

Outdated title. (CC) Tbhotch™ 18:21, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Relable sources

Unlikely misspelling TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 18:12, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:AUTOCONFIMRED

Unlikely misspelling created due to an incoming link that probably should have just been corrected rather than having this redirect created. Steel1943 (talk) 16:43, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pauletta Brupbakher

Double typo, unlikely search term, originated from a Wikidata error apparently Fram (talk) 16:35, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Double error (on my part): turns out it wasn't a wikidata error, but rather the spelling of her name transliterated from Russian. Since she was Russian (ish), it makes sense that we had it that way originally. I've fixed the Wikidata item and added the Russian spelling to the article now. -- asilvering (talk) 16:38, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Racially motivated violence

Only four articles currently make use of this redirect. In all four cases, "hate crime" would be a more appropriate target than "ethnic conflict". So I suggest retargeting the redirect to "hate crime". Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 15:57, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blind tasting

Ambiguous name, as you can do a blind tasting of any alcohol. Plausible search terms for this include Blind wine tasting and Beer tasting#Blind tasting, so I suggest converting this into a DAB page. No evidence that wine tasting is the primary topic for this name. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:28, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FC Türkiye II

This could refer to the B-team of the target club, but it isn't mentioned in that page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:04, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Show Business (TV series)

Split or bespoke decisions Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: resolved

Love Me (TV series)

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: withdrawn

Wikipedia:Picture turorial

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy delete

It's time to d-d-d-d-duel

There is no mention of "d-d" at the target article. Per the RCATs, this is apparently a related meme quotation, yet does not appear anywhere as written within the article. People looking for Yu-Gi-Oh! can reach the subject by typing Yugioh. Hyphenating between all the d's, just to reach an undiscussed meme subject, does not seem particularly useful or helpful here. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:59, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Helpful to whom exactly? Personally, I search for a meme expecting information about a meme. 90% of people familiar with the meme know it's from Yu-Gi-Oh (or seems to be that way from [15], where it is discussed on KnowYourMeme). At the very least, readers expect to read about the thing they searched about. So readers get here thinking "oh so the meme is discussed on this page, great!" One then spends the next 50 thousand bytes searching and searching and nope, zero context, zero benefit. We don't need a redirect for "it's time to d-d-d-d-duel" if all it's going to imply is "this term is synonymous with the entire concept of the Yu-Gi-Oh! general topic article, with no specific section or anchor implied."
Memes are novel. I'm not surprised that people WANT to learn about it here, yet still not useful as a 1-to-1 redirect as it currently leaves people lost on a page without any information for their meme search term, and no mention of "meme" at Yu-Gi-Oh. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:17, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Yu-Gi-Oh! Duel Monsters. This isn't simply a meme-- it's a direct quotation from the original opening sequence for the English dub of this specific anime, with most meme-ification of this quote simply extending the "d-d-d-d-d-d" stuttery part, or otherwise playing around with it and the Yu-Gi-Oh anime's characters in general. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 06:17, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So, it's a meme then. I'm well aware of the Yu-Gi-Oh sequence in question, and the associated meme and its derivations. It's clearly not a "direct quotation", else this text (hyphens and all) would appear in the episode transcript here: [16]. Regardless, thank you for suggesting a more-related option. But it's still an unmentioned meme. How does this have any bearing on the likelihood of typing a d, followed by a hyphen, followed by a d, followed by a hyphen, followed by a d, followed by a hyphen, followed by a d, followed by a hyphen, followed by a d, followed by "uel"? And all to end up at an article for the series where the meme being sought isn't mentioned, nor any of the meme-spellings? Even in the anime and the video you linked, they stutter like 9 times, so even that aspect isn't accurate within this redirect, and none of It's time to duel, It's time to d-duel, It's time to d-d-duel, It's time to d-d-d-duel, It's time to d-d-d-d-duel (is nommed), It's time to d-d-d-d-d-duel, It's time to d-d-d-d-d-d-duel, It's time to d-d-d-d-d-d-d-duel, It's time to d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-duel, It's time to d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-duel exist, or It's time to dduel, It's time to ddduel, It's time to dddduel, or It's time to ddddduel for that matter. Past precedent has indicated that random hyphens inserted into words is not useful, obfuscates the terms that are actually spoken, and makes searches impractical. And at least for these precedent discussions, they were for quotes which appeared at the target, iirc (in an unmodified/natural state that is, I think). The quote is officially "it's time to duel". Anything beyond that, makes it a meme/meme version. Someone committing to the 5 ds/4 hyphens combination is deliberately typing in a meme into the search engine, so if maintained, the content should reflect that. Neither the real version nor any of the meme variations are covered at the new suggested target either, and Wikipedia is not a collection of memes. Utopes (talk / cont) 16:34, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cremastra (u — c) 14:28, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 02:19, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Conerve

No mention of "conerve" at the target article. Possibly a portmanteau of "complex nerve"? But without a definition, is confusing. I'm getting mixed results when I type in "conerve" in search engines, which say something about a "conerve capsule"(?) (but are generally about being one letter off of "conserve"). In any case, without a mention, there is currently nothing suitable for incoming readers using this search term. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:06, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 02:17, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cowboy Luttrell

No mention of "Cowboy" or "Luttrell" at the target article. Not a helpful redirect if we have no content on this supposed individual wrestler at the target article for the NWA. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:12, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 02:16, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 31

The only reasoning for this appears to be "Java (specifically the java.util.Calendar class) allows dates such as February 0 (= January 31) and April 31 (= March 1)." The problem is that that particular class in Java seems to accept any integer for the date. I tested "April 366" which showed up as March 31 of the next year. The internet does say that there is a reference to "April 31" in the The Long Walk by Stephen King, but it is purposely supposed to be a fictional date, even within that universe. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:47, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 02:11, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous "planet 3" redirects

Earth is, unsurprisingly, not the only "planet three". This is a highly ambiguous and fairly implausible search term. Ditto for the rest. Delete. Cremastra (u — c) 01:45, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

21 Andromedae (talk) 18:06, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@21.Andromedae Why is only first one ambiguous? Thanks, Cremastra (u — c) 19:32, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Planet three isn't the same as 3rd planet, and nobody calls Earth as planet three. 21 Andromedae (talk) 20:06, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: I have bundled "1st planet", "2nd planet", and "4th planet" in this discussion. Cremastra (u — c) 19:32, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:30, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 02:05, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Her Royal Hotness

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

This designation is not mentioned at the subject. Redirect is confusing, misleading, ambiguous and undiscussed. People looking for this term are looking for encyclopedic coverage of such a buzzword "her royal hotness", which is not currently found at the page for Pippa Middleton nor anywhere on Wikipedia. This is a novel term, and hasn't ever been mentioned at the subject's article, since the last bout in 2020. No coverage of the phrase "her royal hotness" anywhere on Wikipedia, so this WP:Surprising non-RS term should be removed. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:01, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • My !vote was previously based on personal experience of hearing this term generically applied to nearly any "hot girl", particularly those seen as "higher class", by peers. Google, on the other hand, makes it fairly clear that this is attested to refer to this one person, so extremely consistently it makes for an overwhelming WP:PTOPIC. No, it's not mentioned in the article, nor should it be, as the vast number of sources that use it so overwhelmingly often are not reliable... but redirects are not article content, and need not be held to the same sourcing or inclusion standards. This redirect will help users who encounter the term in the wild find out who is being referred to. Fieari (talk) 05:53, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 02:04, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Site-specific Comedy Opera

According to the internet "site-specific theatre refers to a theatre performance which is staged in a non-traditional space". This needs to be re-targetted, but I'm unsure where. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:17, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:23, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 02:02, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Dutch general election

There is no election planned in 2025 Dajasj (talk) 18:37, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 02:01, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

三州府

There's two possible targets for 三州府: Straits Settlements and Suong. 三州府 is an old alternative Chinese-language name Straits Settlements, and 三州府市 (三州府 + city) is the name historically and currently used by Chinese-speakers and Chinese Cambodians people for Suong. The Chinese Wikipedia has chosen to solve this with a disambiguation page zh:三州府, so this term seemingly cannot be tied very strongly to one article. I'm not seeing how we could create a local policy-compliant dab page. Given the very high bar needed to have a non-English redirect page, we should probably delete this. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 20:22, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 02:01, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Convert to a disambi , I have no further comment. Jothefiredragon🐲talk🐉edits 08:41, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Licensing Letter

Redirect title appears to be a company name that's loosely related? Not mentioned at target article, possible promotion LR.127 (talk) 01:07, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Like License Global that's mentioned in the article The Licensing Letter is a trade publication that covers the licensing industry. They used to publish their top brand lists from 2010 to 2018 (used here List of highest-grossing media franchises) and have been mentioned in reliable sources like The Hollywood Reporter. [28], The Morning Call [29],Chicago Tribune [30][31], Star Tribune [32] , among others. Timur9008 (talk) 05:25, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Żwaniec

This article exists at Polish Wikipedia - therefore, appears to be a translated name that's not significant to the target article. LR.127 (talk) 01:00, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It is not a translated name, but a historical Polish name, as it was part of Poland for several centuries. The redirect is similar to many other towns, which were formerly part of Poland, Hungary, Lithuania, Romania, Denmark, Germany, etc, but whose state affiliation has changed since, and there are articles in which the town is mentioned under its Polish name as a reference to the history of that period. Marcin 303 (talk) 10:58, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Solidarity, Ecology, Left Alternative

not mentioned at target article. Ironically, when searching this term on the internet, the article for Eco-socialism popped up. LR.127 (talk) 00:51, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Manush Shah

No point in this redirect, there is no much coverage about him in this page. he is mentioned in some events. should be deleted until an actual article is made. Sports2021 (talk) 00:40, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 6

Football in American Samoa

The sport of "football" in American Samoa typically refers to American Football, which has much greater participation among American Samoans than does Association Football. I propose that this be either retargeted to American Football in American Samoa, or that a dab page be created between the two. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:49, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tim McBride

Pre-notability deadname not mentioned in article. It's unlikely anyone knows of her by this name but not her current name. Fathoms Below (talk) 22:26, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Name not mentioned at target, and likely will never be per MOS:DEADNAME.
-insert valid name here- (talk) 21:01, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Busy2

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: G5 speedy deleted by User:Amortias

Template:Wikipedia ads single

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy delete

47th president

Ambiguous. 47th President of the United States already exists. MSMST1543 (talk) 21:25, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Matsubara dialect

No mention in target article. Google search pulls little results bar city existence and being a Japanese dialect. Blethering Scot 21:23, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If they're called dialects (方言), they're actually Ryukyuan dialects, and not part of Japanese (see Japanese dialects). As for the existence of the Matsubara dialect, there are some information about the pitch accent data from a quick search:
https://doi.org/10.15002/00012659
I wonder what else could be the criteria. Chuterix (talk) 21:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nesebu dialect

No mention in target article. No google hits on dialect, except for place existing. Blethering Scot 21:14, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Early Netherlandish painters

Split or bespoke decisions Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: Withdrawn

List of Greek words with English derivatives

Previous AfDs for this article:

The target is not a list of Greek words. The target is about English words, and not in a list. People searching for such a list would not find it at the target article, and with the preference of "greek words" being used first, the desire is for an article centralized around Greek words, which is not available. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, charlotte 👸♥ 20:12, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Interlingue periodicals

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

List of molecules by year of discovery

The target list of molecules has no mention of a "year of discovery". Is currently a misleading redirect as this cannot be sorted for in the target article's current state. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:49, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, charlotte 👸♥ 20:12, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If there was no chance of it not being deleted at Afd, then yes, we should delete here per WP:SNOWBALL. But that's not the case here. Yes, such a list could never be complete, but enwiki has many such lists, like List of molecules. It never got the chance to be expanded, as it was immediately improperly redirected (improper because if it were deemed we shouldn't have such a list, it was unreasonable to expect anyone searching it to find the information at a different, broader list.) Mdewman6 (talk) 23:56, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Neverwinter Nights characters

Previous AfDs for this article:

There is no such "list of characters" at the target article. The only character that is EVER mentioned at the target, is the unnamed "player character", and one mention of a "King of Shadows" in passing. Was created as a result of the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Neverwinter Nights characters AfD. Nevertheless, this is not a helpful redirect in its current form. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:52, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete, if without prejudice to recreating if usable sources are found. list not present. i think misleading readers would do more harm than losing track of an afd thread in a mainspace page's edit history. even then, deletion would most likely link people attempting to recreate it to this discussion, which in turn links to that discussion, so... cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:24, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Since when do redirects need sources? Jclemens (talk) 23:58, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I presume it refers to sources at the target article, to substantiate a mention of multiple characters and allow readers to receive sourced content, when it is specified in the search bar (via this redirect) that the reader SPECIFICALLY wants a "list of characters", one that we don't have anywhere in mainspace, nor any sources for. Redirects do need to be "reliably sourceable", because all material in mainspace must be verifiable, and redirects are material, and redirects are in mainspace. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:29, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We should indeed have a list of characters at the target, but the content is already available even if not in that page currently. No, redirects don't need to be reliably sourced, per WP:RPURPOSE. Jclemens (talk) 07:10, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:RPURPOSE is a guideline; WP:V is policy. Redirects too must be verifiable. Alternate spellings can be verified by WP:COMMONSENSE. What reason-for-maintaining bullet point does this redirect (a redirect indicating a "list of characters") meet on WP:RPURPOSE? Utopes (talk / cont) 07:24, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, since COMMONSENSE can satisfy V, then, V's not really an issue, is it? Jclemens (talk) 00:52, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i said i'd have no prejudice against recreation if sources could be found cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 10:49, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but that doesn't explain why deleting a redirect to a notable work of fiction would be influenced in any way by sourcing--presumably, non-primary sourcing--for a set of elements that meet WP:CSC clause 2. Jclemens (talk) 20:38, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are secondary sources out there which would allow to include some commentary on characters as a group and individually into the target, but which have not yet been employed. Like [34] or [35]. Or, from a very different angle, an analytical comment on player characters on Dungeons, Dragons, and Digital Denizens, p. 20-21. Daranios (talk) 11:15, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have now included a rudimentary listing of characters in the Reception section, with potential for expansion based on said secondary sources, which I hope solves the gravest misgivings of Utopes and cogsan. Based on this I'd argue for the inclusion of the old, userfied page into the history of the redirect, as it could be used as a basis to search for more secondary sources, if someone should desire to do so. Daranios (talk) 16:19, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, charlotte 👸♥ 20:12, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i don't think some examples in the reception section would count as enough to warrant a list redirect, so i guess my vote stays for the moment, with equally little prejudice against recreation cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 23:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Cogsan: So what in your view is still lacking for such a redirect to be justified? Number of characters? Description/commentary? Presentation in bulletpoint form or some such? Daranios (talk) 14:17, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
what i think is missing is a list. "list of knives" probably shouldn't link to an article that only mentions santoku and bread knives, as an example. also as an example, characters of deltarune and that other game doesn't mention every character (where's lemon bread?), but it does have a good handful
so yeah, "number of characters" is the closest to my answer among the options provided, and if reliable sources only seem to cover three of them in any level of detail, i'd say press the big ol' return to red button cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:54, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Cogsan: Thanks. WP:RETURNTORED starts with "If the redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article". It might, but though it pains me to say, the last AfD dedided that it did not have the potential to be expandied into its own article then. So do you still not like the redirect even though to my knowledge there is no other article which would cover even the four/five characters we have at the target now? Or to look at it from the other direction, what would be the number for characters you would see as the minimum for an embedded list to not want to delete our redirect? Daranios (talk) 09:17, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What exactly is the problem here? Red link or redirect, if you can disprove the old AfD by finding sources that allow a new list article to be written, then you can just do that! Retaining this redirect doesn't help. The redirect does not have the old article history, so that argument for keeping it is moot. The old article history is available and userfied, so you have that. You are arguing like this is AfD but the only consideration is whether this is a useful redirect. On that score, it clearly isn't. There are at least nine articles that show up in search if you look for Neverwinter Nights [36]. Now if someone is looking for a list of Neverwinter nights characters, the redirect chooses to send them to one of these pages and ignore the others. The reader is taken to a page that does not list the characters, and does not meet their information requirement. If anyone were actually interested in all of the characters, they are better off seeing all nine articles listed, which will give them a fuller picture, rather than being taken to a page that does not answer their information requirement but pretends to. I just do not see what the benefit is of retaining a redirect that has no history and no utility. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 09:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
wouldn't the fact that it was deemed that there weren't enough sources for an article then, and that that's still the case now, be more reason to delete?
i have some level of hope that it might be possible to create that list someday, i just know that that's not today cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:28, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) I am not sure if I could disprove the AfD in the form of establishing this as a notable topic, and I don't currently have the time (or rather priority based on many other open to-do ideas) to make sure one way or another. And that is not the issue. (I'd be for restoring the userfied history as I said. But the history I was originally referring to was the link to the deletion discussion in the talk page.) I am pretty sure that I could create an embedded list, and for that it would be useful to know opinions how (big) such a list should look to make sense. Just as one project utilizing secondary sources on this topic which have not been (fully) used yet. On the other hand, the AfD did establish this redirect, so redirect, if you can disprove the old AfD does not make sense to me. Rather, deleting the redirect would mean overturning the AfD result. But I guess that's within the prerogative of RfD. Looking at the other hits again I am no longer completely sure if it is best to guide the reader to Neverwinter Nights at this point. We do have five characters there currently, and overall commentary, and it fits better to the redirect title. But other hits do have several characters embedded, too. So withdrawing my keep !vote for the time being, but I am still interested in cogsan's answer to my question above. Daranios (talk) 19:34, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
this is on a case-by-case basis, so the best way to put it is
  • general franchises: at least most of the major cast being notable, with some wiggle room for a handful of more important/popular yet not very notable ones
  • general franchises that are really long: if they're not known for more than one character, just go for articles for the few notable ones. otherwise, same criteria seem to apply
  • novels and other such character-heavy franchises (which nn seems to be): there's usually no plan b for if not enough of them are notable for a list, so to quote a wise scorpion, "lol. lmao."
  • pokémon: the best way to describe the situation with pokémon and its (human) characters, and how rules related to notability are treated in its context, is doing multiple backflips in a row to distract people from the question while professor elm keeps his entry
it's a complicated case, but it seems neverwinter nights just plain doesn't have enough notable characters in the first place, "major" or not
and granted, this is for if such a list exists in the first place, and since the answer to that in this case is "not anymore lol", it's really just a matter of deleting and hoping the case changes sometime before the sun goes boom cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:24, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, pinging Mark viking, who had suggested the redirect back at the AfD. Daranios (talk) 19:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It was the AfD which made this a redirect in the first place. Daranios (talk) 10:54, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Leedsshire

Non plausible search term. Blethering Scot 15:00, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Future Survivor seasons

No mention of the 49th or 50th season at the target and, based on the lead, the series is currently only renewed up until the 48th season. As such, the redirects are misleading and WP:TOOSOON. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE. Unnecessary and too soon. Season 48 hasn’t even debuted yet. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:09, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Totally WP:TOOSOON. - UtherSRG (talk) 02:03, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Future United States House of Representatives elections

Not mentioned at the target at all. The farthest away election mentioned in 2028, making the redirects misleading and WP:TOOSOON. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:04, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Way too soon. Besides, 2030 isn't even an applicable election- its either 2028 or 2032.removed as I might be wrong Can be mistaken as a hoax ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Cooldudeseven7 join in on the tea talk 17:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Karhusaari (island)

Misleading redirect. There are several islands named Karhusaari in Finland, the island in Angelniemi is not the only one and probably the most notable either. The redirect had two incoming links, neither of which was actually about the island in Angelniemi: one was for an island in Espoo and the other for an island in Kuopio. I removed the wikilinks from both. This redirect should be deleted until we have an actual article about at least some island named Karhusaari. JIP | Talk 12:52, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cricoarytenoid

There is also Cricoarytenoid joint and Cricoarytenoid ligament. This could be a set index like Arytenoid. 1234qwer1234qwer4 09:57, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Presume good faith

JPerez90, there's a reason we don't generally make these. See also The five pillars and The Manual of Style. Remsense ‥ 论 05:35, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Chalcolithic cultures of China

No such list of Chalcolithic cultures exists at the target. This does not appear to be a subject that is discussed on Wikipedia at this time. Previously existed as a list with one entry.

This title may be able to be salvaged if the list of Neolithic cultures is expanded to include Chalcolithic cultures. However, searching for an article about a "Copper Age list" and being sent to an article about a "Stone Age list" does not seem generally helpful in a vacuum, and would be confusing to readers if there is no indication or hatnote about why they ended up here (that there may not have been enough content to substantiate an individual page for Chalcolithic). Utopes (talk / cont) 00:05, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:36, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Men's Basketball Tournament Finals broadcasters

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

2041 Ryder Cup

Not mentioned at target. No relevant info there, making this redirect misleading. Delete as WP:TOOSOON. Hey man im josh (talk) 02:39, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 5

Barangay 79

There are at least 3 Barangay 79s, and this one in Caloocan is not WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Howard the Duck (talk) 21:20, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, charlotte 👸♥ 22:09, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Daesh Tunisia

I was highly confused by this redirect, and my external searching of "Daesh Tunisia" led me to uncover that apparently it is the "name of an invasive crustacean", per [37]. This blue crab might be invading Tunisia, but what it is ALSO invading is this article which has nothing to do with the subject. No mention of "daesh", "crab", "crustacean", or even "blue" at the target article. People looking for information on this blue crab would be very confused by the topic of Ansar al-Sharia, and if these two DO have a correlation, such a correlation is unclear with zero mention. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:27, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Daesh is ISIS. This redirect is calling them Tunisian ISIS. They were closer to Al-Qaeda.
This name actually does get used in RS [38], but for Jund Al Khilafa-Tunisia or JAK-T, which we do not have a page on. We do have a page on the Algerian one though PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:02, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm quite surprised we do not have a page on JAK-T PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:04, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'll try to have an article created. Mooonswimmer 04:43, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, charlotte 👸♥ 22:08, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Daesh is what the Arab world calls ISIS. The Office of Foreign Assets Control, UN Security Council, US Department of State, and European Union all mention "Daesh Tunisia" as an alias of JAK-T. Mooonswimmer 04:42, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Electrotechnology

According to the brief page history of this WP:DICDEF, electrotechnology is not simply "electrical engineering". From my external searches of this term, I'm getting mixed results. The question then becomes... what would be the best location to target this term? Because the term "electrotechnology" is not written anywhere at the target. It seems to be a valid question if the two terms are "apparently not 1:1 synonyms". But if they are synonyms, then this, too, should probs be indicated somewhere, and I feel something about "electrotechnology" could be added to the article to substantiate the redirect in that case. This would answer the question for people who use an "electrotechnology" search term to navigate Wikipedia, instead of seeking out the very long article on all of electrical engineering. As it happens, Electrical engineering technology also exists as an entirely different article. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:39, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, charlotte 👸♥ 22:08, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fox (channel)

Looking at the page histories of both titles, the contents using the redirect title here at RFD later evolved to its current target. I'm listing this here for a fresh discussion of its either possible deletion or re-targeting/redirection. Intrisit (talk) 21:53, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Grooving

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Starlow

Starlow debuted in this game, but she appears in later entries too. She doesn't have an entry on List of Mario franchise characters though. TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 16:39, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

keep in absence of that entry, like popple (nintendo) redirecting to superstar saga when he was also in dream team cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:46, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, charlotte 👸♥ 21:40, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Purge the page

Very implausible for an WP:XNR TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 20:05, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Rediretc

Very implausible typo on top of the fact that it's in project space. TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 19:56, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Redirct

Slightly plausible error, but it's in project space. TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 19:55, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requested Articles/Business and economics/Companies

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy deleted

Wikipedia:REVERET

This misspelling already appears to be implausible, but it's is in project space so it's even less likely to get used. TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 19:40, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:RSreliable sources

Appears to be another linking error. Looking at the page links, it appears to be a fairly common error where someone doesn't type "|" between RS and reliable sources. TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 19:39, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chocottone

chocotone (one t) is a brazilian recipe featuring chocolate. no idea what a brazil is, but i hear it's relatively popular there. still unmentioned, though cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Olivolja

swedish for olive oil. target seems to have no particular affinity with sweden cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ghost pepper (version 2)

Split or bespoke decisions Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: resolved. This was an artifact left over from when Anthony Appleyard moved Bhut jolokia to Ghost pepper back in 2020. I've moved the edit history back under Bhut jolokia, which essentially completes the WP:ROBIN. -- Tavix (talk) 19:39, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

John Reilly (actor)

See recently closed RM. No primary topic; redirect to dab. 162 etc. (talk) 17:28, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Granatawerfer

"granatwerfer" (from granate and werfer) is a plausible, if apparently archaic name for mortar launchers (though i'd associate it more with grenade launchers). "granatawerfer" is not a word, because granata is italian for grenade. opinions on its plausibility as a misspelling or something else i might have missed? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:16, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

should mention that i would create granatwerfer as a redirect to grenade launcher, but there are articles for three separate granatwerfer, which astute eyes may realize are all mortars, so i'll do it after this discussion closes to see where it should target. then again, judging by the articles' current states, grenade launchers and mortars might not have any particular affinity for germany in the first place. how complicated~ cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:24, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Granatwerfer is reasonable as either a redirect to mortar, or a disambig. Grantawerfer is a typo or else a literary weapon used across the dining tables of Islington and Trumpington.Andy Dingley (talk) 17:40, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ray Lavender

Not mentioned at the target in any capacity. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't see any relevance in the redirect, as Ray Lavender was not a notable figure while contracted as an artist of KonLive Distribution. He released 4 singles, none of which of was any relevance even with a T-Pain feature. His time was so brief at the label that most people are unaware that he was on the label, and was one of the main factors for my omission of his name in the former artists section. Eder Srld (talk) 02:14, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

23th Senate of Puerto Rico

Delete This was created by an editor who made a typo and accidentally created this redirect, and subsequently used by an editor three times who thought the correct word is 23th instead of 23rd, I have fixed all three occurrences of 23th Senate of Puerto Rico into 23rd Senate of Puerto Rico in Wikipedia and this redirect can be safely deleted. Sir Kenneth Kho (talk) 16:59, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:HESD

Manual of Style does not need its own pseudo-namespace Hexware (talk) 16:35, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a pseudo-namespace. Gonnym (talk) 17:41, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
MOS: does have its own psuedo namespace it's used all the time Cyber the tiger (talk) 17:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Instead of creating unnecessary redirects, maybe use your time in other ways. Wikipedia:Namespace, "MOS" is not a pseudo-namespace, but a real one recently created. Gonnym (talk) 22:14, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:MOSSECTIONHEADINGS

Unused short redirect; Correct form would be to WP:MOS#Section_Headings Hexware (talk) 16:35, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uncomfiness

Not a word Hexware (talk) 16:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uncomfort

Not a word Hexware (talk) 16:33, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Touota

Unlikely typo Hexware (talk) 16:33, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:What WP is not

Short redirects to WP:xyz are written without spaces, and in all caps Hexware (talk) 16:33, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

keep. "wp:" automatically gets converted to "wikipedia:" for the purposes of literally anything besides typing and reading, so this one is fine in that area. could make an argument for the use of the abbreviation being a little implausible, but i'm not feeling it to be honest
also, see not-full-caps equivalents of actual short redirects, like wp:brd, wp:mos, and wp:th, and notice that despite what i typed, they got automatically converted to "wikipedia:" when linking cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:33, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pablo Pivasso

Unlikely typo Hexware (talk) 16:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfinished basement

Unnecessary redirect Hexware (talk) 16:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ac/DC

Unnecessary redirect; When would a user have AC lowercased and DC uppercased? Hexware (talk) 16:30, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We do have an entire AC/DC (disambiguation) ;; and the non-music electrical topic; the war of the currents between Tesla and Edison -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 23:41, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Charlotte Web

Unnecessary redirect; More likely misspelling would be missing the apostrophe Hexware (talk) 16:30, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:R from opposites

Unnecessary/unused redirect; Antonym is the correct terminology Hexware (talk) 16:28, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Plaisir d'amour ne dure qu'un moment. Chagrin d'amour dure toute la vie.

These are the first two lines of this song, the lyrics of which are no longer mentioned at the target. No indication on why this song over any other song should contain its first two sentences as redirects, as such an act would be an exception and not the norm. Utopes (talk / cont) 08:08, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep; the title of the target IS present in the redirect, which precludes any accusation of the lyrics searched not being present in the article. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 12:47, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vor der Kaserne vor dem großen Tor stand eine Laterne und steht sie noch davor

"Vor der" not mentioned at the target article. Unlikely search term because pages about songs tend to be located at an article that matches their title, not this. Utopes (talk / cont) 08:05, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Police and thieves in the street, oh yeah, scaring the nation with their guns and ammunition

The target page can be reached after the first three words. The rest of this lyric is not mentioned at the target page, and someone specifying all this information instead of stopping at "police and thieves" is likely looking for particular information related to this quote; information that we do not contain anywhere on Wikipedia. Zero mentions across the whole site. Utopes (talk / cont) 08:02, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep; the title of the target IS present in the redirect, which precludes any accusation of the lyrics searched not being present in the article. The rest is in the domain of WP:CHEAP. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 12:48, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Enteractive

unmentioned, results gave me some unrelated brand that does Things™. incoming links seem to imply that it's a developer that worked under ljn maybe probably, but that's all the info i got cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 16:01, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Xenusia

Xenusia is a subgroup of Lobopodia, it shouldn’t be redirected to the parent clade. Plus, it’s widely used enough to warrant a page. IC1101-Capinatator (talk) 15:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nuh uh

Not mentioned in article. Nuh-uh. Not true. Not at all. or the sound it makes usually indicates no. Blethering Scot 14:47, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Henț River

"Hent" is not mentioned at the target article. It is mentioned as a part of Săcuieu (river), as well, and should be pointed at a location where such a river is discussed. However, the target appears as if it may be ambiguous, and the redirect has history. Unsure what to do here. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:49, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:29, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sergey Yurasov

No reference to Sergey in article. Google searches show Sergey but its to another Yurasov. Blethering Scot 14:07, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The first edition of his novel Parallax was published as The Enemy of the People (Russian: Враг народа) under the pseudonym S. Yurasov (Russian: С. Юрасов) Кантемира (talk) 09:25, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallucishaniids

This page shouldn’t be redirected; the reason given is “monotypic taxon”, yet the group was designed to join Hallucigeniidae and Luolishaniidae, therefore it by definition cannot be monotypic. IC1101-Capinatator (talk) 13:55, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MagneLine

unnotable brand. results gave me some type of medicine with the same name and magnezone, but not the flavor of mortar mentioned in the pre-blar history cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:45, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The product appears to still be available, albeit named "Magne Line" (with a space) and, through a series of mergers, is now owned by a company called Maedakosen. However, as that company doesn't have a WP article, the redirect seems pretty useless and I !vote for deletion. MarcGarver (talk) 13:52, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mileu Cyrus

Unlikely error. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:27, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Are we seriously gonna make a redirect for every keyboard slip-up? TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 04:18, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tsylor Swift

Unlikely error. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:27, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 04:18, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Sqift

Unlikely error, not every adjacent key typo needs a redirect. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:25, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 04:17, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:BASTARD

This appears to be a redirect from Wikipedia space to a former administrator's userspace. I'm generally okay with lowbrow hijinks in userspace, but IMHO this language is inappropriate as a page title in Wikipediaspace (which does not exist to please admins past or present). Sorry if I'm whizzing in someone's private pool, but this is an inappropriate word for Wikipedia to use for any person, not to mention lack of any reason to link WP space to userspace in such a way. I'd be happy to be incorrect in this case, but I hope I'm acting in the interest of the pedia. BusterD (talk) 12:31, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

retarget to meeeeee
just kidding, delete. there may be some unambiguous, probably useful use for a redirect like this someday, but that day doesn't seem to be today, or any day before this one, or any day within this year. maybe some mos guide on blps of bastard children? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 16:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because inappropriate. TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 04:20, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Picric acid (homeopathic remedy)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Rage game

There is a genre of game out there called "rage game" in which their main objective is to make the players rage. Notable examples include Getting Over It and A Difficult Game About Climbing. Not sure if the genre is really notable or not, but there are at least two examples I can think off of the top of my head (and those were just limited to the notable ones!). Maybe add a hatnote for the video game called "Rage", which is the current redirect. Someone-123-321 (I contribute) 08:27, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


November 4

September 31

No mention of September 31 in the target page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:54, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone unify it with #April 31? Web-julio (talk) 07:18, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:07, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dhol (Kirat)

This is not a helpful disambiguator, as a "Kirat" variant is not discussed at the target article, so people specifying that they desire a "Kirat" form of the Dhol drum, would not receive it when they search for this title. Contains history. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:03, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:07, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fay Spaniel

This character has no confirmed last name, and this isn't even the right dog breed. QuicoleJR (talk) 15:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:06, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Herbert the Android Pig

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Greater Luxembourg

Delete all three.Retarget to Luxembourg annexation plans after the Second World War. This Euroregion is never referred to as "Greater Luxembourg". РоманЖ (talk) 14:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, possibly redirect to Luxembourg. The thing very definitely exists, see, for example [44] (there are dozens of solid peer-reviewed works using the term). According to this source, the Greater Luxembourg includes "partly derelict French periphery benefiting from the economic spillover of Luxembourg". Having once made an (accidental) stop there, I can vouch for the description. Whether this description matches the Greater Region of SaarLorLux, I do not know (the SaarLorLux seems much larger than what the works describing the Greater Luxembourg imply). Викидим (talk) 15:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See also Luxembourg annexation plans after the Second World War for some historical background of the term. Викидим (talk) 15:39, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: While it seems like a consensus to Keep, some participants are also saying they'd be okay with Retargeting so I'm going to relist this discussion to come to a firmer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:54, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mabe Village

Not mentioned in target. QuicoleJR (talk) 18:14, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:54, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Canada bunting

I could be wrong, but, based on this source from The Canadian Encyclopedia, this is an ambiguous term. I also do not see it mentioned at the target in any capacity. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:08, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • It certainly looks like it, and there were no Tree Sparrows in North America when that was drawn. Passengerpigeon (talk) 13:21, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Religion of nonvoilence

Misspelling and seemingly an undue epithet for redirection. Remsense ‥ 论 21:37, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Vote for deletion

AFD is a discussion, not a vote. TheWikipede (talk) 21:36, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Albanian Italian

Ambiguous with Albanians in Italy—I recommend disambiguating. Cremastra (u — c) 20:59, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This combination of two different names for the character, combined by the / character, is a very unlikely search term. QuicoleJR (talk) 20:56, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: What's particularly odd is that apparently, most first-party sources consider "Dark Link" and "Shadow Link" two different subjects/characters, though Wikipedia currently doesn't. Steel1943 (talk) 22:41, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Swiftmas

Delete per WP:RSURPRISE considering the term is unmentioned and the target section does not exist. Steel1943 (talk) 20:26, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oh come on, it's barely november
delete per nom cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:46, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Swifties#Relationship with Swift. The term is mentioned there. Could see a reasonable case to develop a little info about it at Cultural impact of Taylor Swift given some coverage in sources[45] and then subsequently retarget. estar8806 (talk) ★ 22:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Swifties#Relationship with Swift since that actually contains the term unlike her main bio page. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 02:31, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Party in the UDA

Another unlikely misspelling since 3 words have to be typed correctly before getting to the misspelling. Steel1943 (talk) 20:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Party in the YSA

Borderline unlikely WP:SEO-ish misspelling. Steel1943 (talk) 20:21, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Snooze-A-Koopa

Not mentioned in target. QuicoleJR (talk) 20:17, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a cruel summer

Also a line in Cruel Summer (Bananarama song). No reason why one should be preferred over the other. Steel1943 (talk) 20:15, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MoMA The Museum of Modern Art

Unlikely redirect due to redundancy: Acronym at the beginning, then breaking down the acronym after the acronym. Reader would just ... type the acronym or the name, not both. Steel1943 (talk) 20:13, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

dpn delete per nom cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:48, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is how they style themselves on their social media (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Flickr) making this a very plausible search term. Thryduulf (talk) 20:49, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Partyintheusa

Unlikely lack of spaces. This redirect was created this year; such redirects are no longer technically necessary since the software that runs Wikipedia no longer requires using camel case titles. Steel1943 (talk) 20:09, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Partu in the USA

Unlikely misspelling. Steel1943 (talk) 20:05, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Toyota CNa

Very unlikely phonetic misspelling, especially considering all the letters in the phonetic aren't the same case. Steel1943 (talk) 19:59, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Garbage truxk

Typing the entire first word correctly, then somehow mistyping the second word, especially considering that Truxk has never existed, seems unlikely and WP:COSTLY. Steel1943 (talk) 19:56, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom, and maybe trout the creator or something. they've made a lot of indiscriminate typo redirects, wowie cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:51, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WPNFCC

Malformed shortcut missing the colon which makes it a cross namespace redirect as it is not in the Wikipedia namespace. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 19:40, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:N F C C

Improper shortcut, shortcuts aren't supposed to have spaces like this. Implausible someone would type this instead of just WP:NFCC. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 19:31, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Embedded pun

unmentioned, target section no longer exists, results gave me puns embedded on things and ai slop cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lowest form of humor

entirely correct!! term mentioned once in passing, though, and results seem to be torn between puns, sarcasm (a close second, possibly tied with blp vandalism), and wit (though some refer to wit as the highest form) cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:44, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

should mention. if not deleted, i'll be creating lowest form of humour to accompany it. just not gonna do it now because that'd require the effort of nominating it here, clumping them together, and then it might just get deleted anyway
should also mention that i'm not necessarily voting to delete, as i'm not good enough at dealing with lines that have gone into inspirational quote limbo to opine beyond "this might not be the right target tbh" cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:09, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ハンマーブロス

Not helpful for the English encyclopedia. Appears to refer to the Hammer Bros. antagonists in the Mario franchise. TNstingray (talk) 17:29, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

weak refine to #enemy characters. yeah, that refers to hammer bros. mario is a japanese franchise (really japanese, even, have you seen how many tanuki they can cram into a single game?), so japanese redirects are fine and dandy, though this one isn't mentioned, so meh cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:51, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ジュゲム

Unhelpful for the English encyclopedia, and I don't see a connection to the Mario franchise. Google seems to point to Jugemu if consensus leads to this redirect being kept. TNstingray (talk) 17:28, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

keep. that refers to the lakitu. the japanese name is mentioned (if in a footnote), and while ジュゲム (jugemu) refers to lakitus, 寿限無 (jugemu) refers to jugemu jugemu gokō-no surikire kaijarisuigyo-no suigyōmatsu unraimatsu furaimatsu kuunerutokoro-ni sumutokoro yaburakōji-no burakōji paipopaipo paipo-no shūringan shūringan-no gūrindai gūrindai-no ponpokopī-no ponpokonā-no chōkyūmei-no chōsuke, where lakitu gets its name from. get nippon egao hyakkei'd lol cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:05, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Surface Laptop Studio 2

SLS2 is a different product than SLS (1) Hexware (talk) 16:44, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

either keep in absence of an article for the sls2, or return to red so someone might create that article. i'm leaning towards the latter, but it's just around 15º, so weak delete cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:55, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am creating the article, but still a rough draft the moment [46]. weak delete and return to red in the interim given lack of information about it on the SLS 1 page Anguswiki (talk) 22:59, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WPT:NFCC

This a new cross-namespace redirect that showed up on my Quarry query for cross-namespace redirects that I wanted to run by the regulars at RFD to determine whether it is appropriate. We have few redirects to Wikipedia talk pages. This was originally a redirect to Wikipedia talk:Non-free content criteria but that page is a redirect itself so I corrected it to point to a genuine talk page. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 15:49, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fântânele River (Mureș)

Was redirected under a verifiability concern years ago. Fântânele River doesn't list it. Can't find it on either OSM or Google maps. Used to also have Kutas-patak redirected to it, but that's a waterway somewhere else. Looks like this was the result of some sort of a confusion. Joy (talk) 19:18, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:24, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bundled another version Fântânele River (Mureş).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 18:20, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:44, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Communist Party (Kosovo)

No mention of "communist" at the target article. A misleading redirect to a target where the party in question is not discussed. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:02, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:44, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heather Cerveny

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

D'ni Restoration Council

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Diana Burnwood

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Nomos Publishing House redirects

Not mentioned at the target. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:49, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:26, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How many journals do they publish? If it's not an exorbitant amount, and if the count of 60 is accurate that's not too bad, I'd recommend just adding a list and keeping this. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:19, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Crazee Dayzee

Not mentioned in target. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:16, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sahatit

This redirect doesn't make sense in Albanian language. It's akin to having a redirect like "Of the clock" in English — incorrect and misleading. If it were "Sahati," it would at least be in the nominative case ("The clock"), but it would still miss the essential "tower" element. I'm an Albanian speaker and I've already created another redirect in a better form (Kulla e Sahatit) so this one can be safely deleted I assume. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Klein Muçi (talk • contribs) 13:51, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

World's deepest cave

deepest cave in relation to what? from entrance to lowest point (article says it's veryovkina cave), from depth of the lowest point (article says nothing), or something else? originally redirected to velebit caves, which that article says is only one of the deepest systems. i don't think the current target works since it only gives relative answers (really, it only gives one answer disguised as half an answer), but i also don't think it would count as trivia. opinions? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:31, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to List of deepest caves - aiming at a list that is ordered by how deep they are seems more appropriate than targeting a specific cave, and definitely more helpful than targeting the general Cave article. We seem to do a similar thing for World's tallest building → List of tallest buildings BugGhost🦗👻 17:44, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mlawu ka Rarabe

This redirects to Mlawu ka Rarabe's father, it seems unnecessary Smallangryplanet (talk) 10:36, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Useful for people looking for royal geneaologies. However, there are WP:RETURNTORED considerations. As there are no other biographical detail other than the mention of being the son. Ca talk to me! 12:40, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dream Factory (game developer)

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

PKS 1402-012

This belongs on the target list, but is just one of 8000, and isn't mentioned there. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:41, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Northern countries

Recently created and very vague. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 05:26, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Without further context, these terms appear to be mainly used as synonyms in regard to their development. [47][48][49][50].
I suggest a {{redirect}} hatnote to nordic countries since they share the similar meanings, and I found one source that refers to the nordics as northern: [51] Ca talk to me! 12:23, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
After reading the below IP editor's comment, disambiguation may be the best answer. It is a vague, yet still oft-used term. Ca talk to me! 15:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Work is an honor

Seemingly unmentioned at the target. Also could not pull anything obvious up with a general search. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 05:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments Appears to be a common refrain posted on gulags. The first thing a prisoner would have seen on their arrival at Vorkuta was a sign that said: “Work in the USSR Is a Matter of Honor and Glory.”[52], The emphasis is on the victims of the Gulag; the authors of the exhibition give a clear answer to the sacrosanct question, "To what deity were these sacrifices made?": No deity was involved. In some cases, a large ceremonial portrait of Stalin—the system's main demiurge— appears above the photographs of construction sites and camps. One characteristic example is the Museum of Military and Labor Glory (Taiga, Kemerovo). The exhibition "Rehabilitation" occupies a separate hall: in the "red corner" (traditionally used for icons) hangs a ceremonial portrait of Stalin decorated with barbed wire next to the slogan "For us, work is an HONOR, a deed of valor and heroism." [53]
A mention could potientially added, although I will leave it for others to find out if it is WP:DUE. Ca talk to me! 12:34, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, “Work in the USSR Is a Matter of Honor and Glory” is a common slogan of Soviet GULAGs.
https://tadexprof.com/vorkuta-gulag/ NagisaEf (talk) 05:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jackie Aprile (disambiguation)

It simply ain’t disambiguating anything. Roasted (talk) 03:21, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete While there are many characters of the same family that is named Jackie Aprile in the show, the page is not disambiguating anything. Was bot-created erroneously. Ca talk to me! 12:37, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy per WP:CSD#G14. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 21:19, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The third bullet point of G14 is A redirect that ends in "(disambiguation)" but does not redirect to a disambiguation page or a page that performs a disambiguation-like function (such as set index articles or lists). since it's targeting a list, it isn't eligible for G14. There are multiple Jackie Apriles talked about on that page so seems close to correct. Probably not very useful but not sure if that's really enough to delete. Skynxnex (talk) 17:03, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete G14 doesn't apply in a technical sense, but this is confusing and not useful. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:11, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is Elon Musk

Didn't bother merging it with the other discussion because the other discussion is going to end early due to WP:G7 and this redirect is slightly less blatantly implausible than This is Elon Musk Tesla cofounder and CEO, even if it's still very implausible. TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 03:14, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be an internet meme [54]. Not notable for mention in the main article. Readers following this redirect will be confused as the information they are looking for is not present. Delete Ca talk to me! 12:14, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes this is a meme. Your point is valid this might confuse some readers that may not know what the meme is. However most people that search this up knows what the meme is because no person that doesn't know what the meme is will most likely not search it up in that manor. Idek mann (talk) 13:21, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Idek mann (talk) 13:24, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1HQ3Go3ggs8pFnXuHVHRytPCq5fGG8Hbhx

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Arbeitsamt

The term is never mentioned in the target article. Perhaps it should be retargeted to Arbeitsamt in occupied Poland or be a disambig? It is also not mentioned in de version of the target article, de:Arbeitsamt does not have a wiki article yet (it seems related to the Public employment service) Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 23:15, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the proposed retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cremastra (u — c) 23:22, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:00, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

S-compact space

This seems to be a different concept that is not described anywhere. 1234qwer1234qwer4 17:42, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or keep?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:11, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes (talk / cont) 23:06, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:59, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Snapseed 2.22.412829873

It would make sense to have a redirect for a particularly important software version, but that version (and its importance) would need to be mentioned in the target page. WP:NOTCHANGELOG -MPGuy2824 (talk) 17:23, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It also would likely want to go to a section header / anchor, instead of simply Snapseed. In any case, delete as per WP:RETURNTORED; there may be important info on this topic, but it's not here, and a redlink is the best way to convey that. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 17:30, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello nice people ;)... i made it probably when i saw EXIF and see Software used, so i click and reroute to what we had (the article) and probaly that is it. Of course i wont bother if this is changed. Normally i use reroute for cameras in EXIF (EXIF is "cameras fingerprint"). Reroute=redirect --Petar Milošević (talk) 19:20, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Complex/Rational 22:50, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:58, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spacelike vector

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Cancellated

"cancellated" means two different things, neither primarily associated with bones. "cancellous" is apparently more primarily associated with bones though, so that's neato cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:36, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:31, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:55, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ceddin Deden

Article now does not mention Ceddin Deden in any capacity anymore. 🔥Jalapeño🔥 contribs 11:25, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:49, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decco Bishop

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

KP2

Disambiguate Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: disambiguate

November 3

KP1

Disambiguate Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: disambiguate

Holy shit, we're gonna fucking die

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Wikipedia:Surprising

Split or bespoke decisions Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: sync

Brrrt

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

"E-SAF"

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Lists of charcters

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

John Shedletsky

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Bible Hub

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

SUE MEEE?

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

EbonyPrince2K24

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

KVV Heusden-Zolder

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Endo (cannabis)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: now deleted

Ekaladerhan n'Izoduwa n'ovbie Ogiso

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Tatiana Maksimova

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Cho-Island

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

United Rapes

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Circlejerk subreddit

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

1996 in California

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Indy HeroClix (heroclix)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 11#Indy HeroClix (heroclix)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Baronage of Scotland

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Handwriting expert

I would think that the modern primary meaning of "handwriting expert" would be the person who scientifically examines handwriting to determine authorship, not the pseudoscientific person who analysis handwriting to divine personality characteristics. I am on the fence about whether this should be retargeted to Graphanalysis, or disambiguated. BD2412 T 16:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dana Fuller

Delete: "Dana Fuller Ross" was a pseudonym not shortened to "Dana Fuller". Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:56, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Piruzān

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Coramandal FC

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 10#Coramandal FC

List of chairpersons of the Telangana Legislative Council

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

PGC 2399018

This galaxy is part of the target list, but it is one of 73,000 and isn't mentioned there. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:09, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not mentioned. ‹hamster717🐉› (discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠) 13:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The west has fallen, billions must die

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Web interfaces

Delete redundant redirect since we already have Web interface Nuclearelement (talk) 03:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

speedy keep and retarget to Web interface TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 05:50, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Web API along with Web interface and Web-interface. I probably should have checked whether web interface was a redirect or not. TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 22:47, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Web-interface

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Neo-mooris

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Neo-moors

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Çornosturuf

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Kırıvçe

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

This is Elon Musk Tesla cofounder and CEO

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

List of zombie other films

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Ramstyng

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

November 2

Jishan Alam

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Heathe N. Craig Joint Theater Hospital

There is no mention of "Craig" or "Theater" at the target article. This redirect is tagged as having possibilities, but such possibilities are closer to impossible if this redirect is a blue link and pointing at a title where the hospital is not discussed. Is mentioned on 3 pages: List of hospitals in Afghanistan, 455th Air Expeditionary Wing, and Advanced cardiac life support. Unsure if any of these are truly ideal, however, or if WP:REDYES would apply. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:15, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bundled with the other similar redirect as suggested.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 22:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abdullah Al Mamum

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Crop Protection (journal)

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Cruciverbalist

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Scottish Nose-pickers

Little Evidence that this is a title that would be searched for. Only a reference to Nicola Sturgeon Picking her nose can be found using this search term. See no need for a redirect on that basis. Blethering Scot 15:45, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cremastra (u — c) 15:21, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 22:09, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chaotolerance

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 10#Chaotolerance

Ra'ad 1

The more I research this redirect, the more confused I get. For starters, this redirect formerly targeted the article that is currently at Fajr-3 (artillery rocket), and did for the past six years. However, before that, this redirect targeted the article which it currently targets. However, to throw some more confusion into the mix, another similarly-titled article, Raad-1, exists. I may have figured out a better plan for what to do with this redirect by now if it were not for its incoming links; I am not clear what subject these links are meant to refer to. I'm thinking disambiguate is the way to go here, but I'm incredibly unclear what the base title should be for such a disambiguation page. Steel1943 (talk) 00:41, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Notified of this discussion at Raad-1.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 16:36, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:39, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bhairabi Temple, Boudh district

Among the temples listed at the article, "Bhairabi" isn't one of them, and the section this redirect points to no longer exists. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:02, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:39, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Burnt Food

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Barney's Magical Musical Adventure

No mention of "Magical", or "Musical Adventure" at the target article. People looking for this individual show would not receive what they were looking for at the target.

The only mentions of "magical musical adventure" on all of Wikipedia are at David Joyner (actor) (which is unusable imo) and Barney (franchise), which is only mentioned once, in a sidebar. I'm not convinced this is the best option either, but at least better than no mentions (which is the status quo).

It might've been possible for me to retarget to Barney (franchise) without RfDing, as a means of getting it off the current target where its not mentioned, but I slightly prefer deletion of this redirect and/or recreation as an individual page, if that's even possible. Pointing as a redirect to Barney (franchise), with its only mention contained in the infobox, is not very ideal for this subject. All of the other Barney DtV home videos in the infobox seem to have their own standalone articles, so perhaps this one has some hope as well? Especially with the history behind this title, (even if it was supposably unreferenced since 2007, until being BLAR'd in early 2024). Utopes (talk / cont) 22:16, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:35, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Farm park

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Zulu Christianity

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Shen an calhar

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 10#Shen an calhar

Wikipedia:Example of a redirect

Shouldn't an example of a redirect redirect to like an example page? I don't think anyone wants to use this just to get info about redirect policies. TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 21:03, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lana Lang and Clark Kent

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

-1'

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Georgea

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Yosi (Nintendo character)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 9#Yosi (Nintendo character)

Pufferthorn

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Lu Tianna

It's unclear why this redirects here. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:18, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tripartite Treaty (1906)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Tisha Punia

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Handegg

Opening a discussion as this redirect's target has gone back and forth between Handeck and American football since its creation without any consensus. I would say it should clearly point to American football (or possibly Gridiron football), as even a fairly uncommon term for a major sport is far more likely to be the intended meaning by most users rather than an alternative spelling of an extremely small settlement on Switzerland. Chessrat (talk, contributions) 18:29, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm struggling to imagine a realistic scenario in which a reader would be better served by a redirect to a football article than by the current redirect. See Talk:Handeck for past discussions. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 15:56, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bart (devil)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Tony DiGerolamo

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 9#Tony DiGerolamo

Blue Yoshi

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Yellow Yoshi

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Ultrajectine

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 9#Ultrajectine

Waking the Dragons

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 9#Waking the Dragons

Memory World

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 10#Memory World

Duelist Kingdom

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Pegasus' Cards

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

King of Games

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Buster blader

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

It’s time to du-du-du-du-du-du-du-du-duel!

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Banning policy

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Blocking policy

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Username policy

Recently-created cross-namespace redirect. C F A 💬 20:38, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes (talk / cont) 07:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I have added User name policy to this discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 15:41, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Claire Miller

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 9#Claire Miller

ChinaFile

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 9#ChinaFile

Chir'daki

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Murder of Paige Chivers

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Toady (Nintendo character)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

November 1

Usurper King

No consensus Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: no consensus

India women's national futsal team

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Zelda 2016

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Carlos Brown (cricketer)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Gilon Tyson

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Adam Thomas (cricketer)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

OFM Sykes

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 8#OFM Sykes

Nimar Bolden

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Jediah Blades

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Wikipedia:Redirect/Archive 1

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Wikipedia:WikiProject Music/MUSTARD/Redirects

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Good articles on Wikipedia

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 8#Good articles on Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Retarget

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 8#Wikipedia:Retarget

Bibi the butcher

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 8#Bibi the butcher

P Diddler

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Kylie Koopa

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

List of characters in Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Manual of Style:

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 8#Manual of Style:

Mario &Luigi: SuperStar Saga

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Belly Blech

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Panjshiri dialect

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Wikipedia Manual of Style

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

No Original Research

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

WP;OR

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

BLP:CRIME

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Great Depression in the Middle East

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 8#Great Depression in the Middle East

Pink Yoshi

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Hez

Disambiguate Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: disambiguate

Featured article candidates

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 9#Featured article candidates

Nomination featured article

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Diddler and The Diddler

The first redirect was created by a new user in 2015. Unsurprisingly, the topic isn't covered in cheating. The second term is an informal term for Sean Combs. Hence, I'm asking to delete them. Tavantius (talk) 22:55, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, classic {{r from avoided double redirect}}. Diddler => cheater => cheating. Cremastra (u — c) 00:32, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm in agreement, no need for a separate DAB page (struck). I was thinking it was a little silly when I wrote it, but didn't check further after reading WP:RTODAB (confirmation bias strikes again). Going back again I see you're right and WP:DABNAME covers this under point five. ― Synpath 23:23, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
intriguingly, the redirect was created by @FunkMonk, a veteran user with over 100 thousand edits. Tavantius (talk) 04:06, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Which one? 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 06:33, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The nomination of The Diddler had the incorrect target. I have fixed it.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 17:16, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Time of Shedding and Cold Rocks

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Late 00s recession

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 9#Late 00s recession

Moneygeddon

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Eirik Suhrke

Split or bespoke decisions Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: move draft overtop

Snake eyes

This was, for a long time, an article about rolling two ones. Redirected to Craps#Rolling in 2020, as it was deemed not notable enough for a standalone article. Later retargeted to the dabpage. I'd argue this is a good situation for WP:DIFFCAPS - the craps meaning is the primary topic, and nothing at Snake Eyes is referred to as "snake eyes". 162 etc. (talk) 16:15, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move the disambiguation page The purpose is to bring people to the page they are looking for. I think the DAB page lists the media and the "rolling of the dice" definition. There have been two major movies with the same name over the past few decades that might bring people to where they want to go. If people search "snake eyes", it should bring them to the DAB page instead of the "Craps (rolling)" section that does not have a DAB link. Marty2Hotty (talk) 19:35, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Marzipan joyjoys

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 8#Marzipan joyjoys

Menthol Moose

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Haskell Harr

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 9#Haskell Harr

Azaroth

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Morgan Smith (rapper)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Benji Floros

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Shattered Island (Skylanders)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

October 31

Counter-Strike player models

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

White Gangster

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

SpydaT.E.K

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

GKR (DJ)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Ricardo Drue

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Wikipedia:Standard articles

Split or bespoke decisions Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: restore

WPSECONDARY

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Tesonet

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 8#Tesonet

WH:HG

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedily deleted

PKS 0451-28

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 8#PKS 0451-28

Nortwest Airways

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

buccal organ(s)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Articles for deletion/Health of Donald Trump

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Strogino CS Portal

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Building a sentry

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Day belt

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Hat Simulator

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 8#Hat Simulator

The Human Aquarium

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 8#The Human Aquarium

2029 in spaceflight

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 8#2029 in spaceflight

2028 ICC Women's T20 World Cup

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

2031 Africa Cup of Nations

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

2033 SEA Games

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Lists of Telugu films of future years

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

IRAS 13349+1428

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 8#IRAS 13349+1428

Liberal Democratic Hotline Team

No consensus Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: no consensus

Putting wedge

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 8#Putting wedge

Cackala

@Hyphenation Expert: nominated this for R3 because WP:RNEUTRAL: not "in multiple mainstream RS". I have declined this. The term is indeed attested on the internet (c.f. e.g. https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/the-biden-we-were-told-about-never-existed/ and https://moonbattery.com/biden-harris-regime-authorizes-military-to-kill-us/ ), which I think makes it a perfectly reasonable thing for someone to type in the search bar, even if they're not expecting a full article on this word. Duckmather (talk) 13:54, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 16:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lego racers

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy keep

Firstly

Don't think a redirect relating to the adverb to a page that is specifically about the number is a good idea. TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 04:02, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:18, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Notified of the discussion at First, Second (disambiguation) and Third.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 14:49, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ape Escape Racer

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 8#Ape Escape Racer

Jamison Wesley Crowder

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

We're Barack

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Young FC

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Bhuna FC

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Bright (Suikoden)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Gamma Squeeze

Either delete the redir or fix the content of the redir target article. The Short squeeze article currently has no mention of "gamma" or "gamma squeeze" whatsoever. N2e (talk) 10:39, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:45, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bundled with "Gamma Squeeze" as suggested.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:16, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Byron Cemetery

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 8#Byron Cemetery

List of Super Heavies

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 11#List of Super Heavies

Stone Jesus

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 8#Stone Jesus

Alpha myrcene

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Srishti

Disambiguate Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: disambiguate

John Atoms

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

BlueChew

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Gxarha

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Il giustiziere

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

October 29

Worm that turned

No consensus Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: no consensus

Killer Mountain (logo)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Khaidi No. 150 (soudtrack)

I'm nominating this one separately because of its history—it apparently used to be an article about the movie's soundtrack until a deletion discussion in April 2017 (the participants of which that resulted in it being redirected to the current target. Aside from spikes in 2021 and 2022, it hasn't been getting very many pageviews since then, so I'm not 100% sure we need this lying around, plus I've also created the correctly spelled Khaidi No. 150 (soundtrack) (which should help readers find the intended target), so I'd like to hear all your thoughts about this. Also, the participants of the deletion discussion (TheLongTone, Jennica, Bovineboy2008, Serial Number 54129, and Jo-Jo Eumerus) might want to weigh in on the matter, so I'm pinging them in case they have anything they might want to add. Regards, SONIC678 05:56, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:39, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes (talk / cont) 22:30, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I Like My Cheese Drippy, Bruh

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

三州府

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 7#三州府

2025 Dutch general election

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 7#2025 Dutch general election

Good Article nominations

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Communism:Overview

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Space In Stereo

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Starlow

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 5#Starlow

Grooving

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 5#Grooving

Site-specific Comedy Opera

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 7#Site-specific Comedy Opera

Tapestries Muck

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

康米

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Dimethylxanthine

Disambiguate Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: set indexify

Steve Lambert - Emma Goldman Institute For Anarchist Studies

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Dirhodium tetrakis(trifluoroacetate

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy delete

Murgh cholay

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Jokestress

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Joe Hill (journalist)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Joaquin Salamanca

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Jank fraction

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Jacob Condra-Bogan

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Jackask

No mention of "Jackask" at the target, nor any mention anywhere on Wikipedia outside of one, on John Milhiser, where it is listed as a "television title" that he acted in. For a Youtube series that is intended to be pronounced similarly to Jackass, such a misspelling seems to be the likely ask for searchers of this term. Especially since this Youtube series is not discussed at the target article for Jacksfilms. The singular mention at John Milhiser can very well be a piped link to Jack's general article, forgoing the need to have a potentially misleading redirect as a result. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:27, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hydrocal

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Hot Chips

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Herd morality

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Liongate Home Entertainment

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Her Royal Hotness

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 7#Her Royal Hotness

Henț River

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 5#Henț River

Hahn Mahlay

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Gomberg radical reaction

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Clara Gleeson and etc.

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Game data

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

インターネット・アーカイブ

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Uikipedia

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Mollejon Dam

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Ambiguous "planet 3" redirects

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 7#Ambiguous "planet 3" redirects

Crapulinsky

See Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_October_20#Crapulinksy for the reasoning behind this RFD. I didn't notice that the other redirect was misspelled at first. To keep this short, retarget to The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. Nickps (talk) 13:07, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:28, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Celia Homeford: Where is Crapulinksy used in the 18th Brumaire? Can you quote the sentence or point out the location? Jay 💬 11:19, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Final sentence of Chapter 1 according to wikisource. Celia Homeford (talk) 09:05, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How many of us have them

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

October 28

Universe (artwork)

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Matthew sucka

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy delete.

Wokot

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy deleted

Jealousy definitions

Split or bespoke decisions Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: move

Nintendo Twilight

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Mormons Losing Money

No consensus Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: no consensus

4-aminopurine

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Black Yoshi

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Falcoln

No consensus Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: no consensus

Mabe Village

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 4#Mabe Village

Zelda: The Wand of Gannon

his name was initially inconsistently spelled, with "gannon" having been used from 1 to alttp in japan, and only in 1 (and later zelda's adventure, but no one cares about that one) in not japan, so it was already out of the equation by the time the cd-i games were out. point is, getting two names mixed up and using an outdated spelling of that name doesn't seem that plausible cogsan talk page? contribs? it's yours, my friend 13:20, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, plausible and unambiguous; deletion of this does not improve wikipedia BugGhost🦗👻 17:16, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Further detail because this is getting more deletion votes than I expected: According to our article Ganon, In the Japanese versions of the first three games, his name is anglicized as "Gannon", with the citations implying that the spelling "Gannon" was still being used in 1991 (the Wand of Gamelon came out in 1993). Both the Gamelon/Ganon and Ganon/Gannon mixups are both very plausible in my view, and there is no alternate article that this could possibly redirect to - user definitely wants to find the current target. BugGhost🦗👻 18:09, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:11, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very Weak Keep. I will point out that even though Gamelon and Ganon are not the same word, they DO start and end with the same letters. Given Gamelon only appears in this game, while Ganon is the name of the series' overarching antagonist(s), it's perhaps plausible to get the two confused-- "Okay, so the name is Wand of... something? Starts with a G, ends with N... oh, silly me, it's Ganon!"
However-- and this is a big however-- the addition of misspelling Ganon does reduce plausibility a little more-- however, I would like to point out that this is also an extremely common misspelling of Ganon's name, so perhaps it doesn't hurt plausibility as much as it first appears?
I won't fight too terribly hard if it's deemed that this combo is still too implausible to be considered. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 02:57, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Notified of this discussion at the target talk.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 18:12, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

nah, i think 5 delete votes to a keep, a really weak keep, and a slightly less weak keep would have been enough cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:38, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Discussions are based on the strength of arguments, not the strength of bolded !votes. As it happens, it is 3 to 5 numerically, but WP:NOTDEMOCRACY. You may be right in principle but I'd avoid making a comment like this if you're WP:INVOLVED. Utopes (talk / cont) 14:04, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i'll also kind of disagree with that, since even the substantially weak keep vote that the less weak but still weak keep vote was based on argued that getting two names mixed up and misspelling said wrong name might not be all that plausible cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 14:21, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Horse Grass

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Facecore

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Ruffian (Star Fox)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Herbert the Android Pig

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 4#Herbert the Android Pig

Fay Spaniel

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 4#Fay Spaniel

Uppers (video game)

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Greater Luxembourg

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 4#Greater Luxembourg

Canada bunting

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 4#Canada bunting

Loudward

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

The Rhythm of ALT

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Nomos Publishing House redirects

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 4#Nomos Publishing House redirects

Heather Cerveny

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 4#Heather Cerveny

Harapanahalli railway station

There is no mention of "harapanahalli" at the target article, or any other indication about a "Harapanahalli railway station" at the South Western Railway zone article. The only mention of "harapanahalli railway station" anywhere on Wikipedia is at the overarching article for Harapanahalli, but this article has a good number of problems and only contains two references, so it begs the question whether the railway station needs to be mentioned there either. In any case, it seems that there may need to be a change to either the target, or to the content, or to delete entirely if its not necessary to be included anywhere. Utopes (talk / cont) 08:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I'm the person who created this page the Harapanahalli Railway Station which is functioning currently six trains are operating through this station please help me to publish this article
Thank you :) Darshan Kavadi (talk) 15:15, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New York City Birth Index

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Fund for the City of New York

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Fpoon

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 8#Fpoon

Eugenjusz Andrei Komorowski

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Erasing rule

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Electrotechnology

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 5#Electrotechnology

DXAP-TV

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Diana Burnwood

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 4#Diana Burnwood

Dhol (Kirat)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 4#Dhol (Kirat)

David Carroll (academic)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

September 31

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 4#September 31

Darts Australia

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Danut Murariu

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: soft delete

April 31

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 7#April 31

Daesh Tunisia

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 5#Daesh Tunisia

D'ni Restoration Council

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 4#D'ni Restoration Council

October 27

Tata (Persian King)

There were no Persians at the time of Tata Викидим (talk) 21:48, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The Persians haven't been created as separate ethnicity at that time. Ahri Boy (talk) 00:26, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The existence of a redirect is not a "factual offering". The argument for deletion is like saying redirects from typos should be deleted because they imply the typo is correct. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 18:53, 18 October 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 23:41, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chrysolith

Not mentioned at target in this specific spelling; is this as ambiguous as Chrysolite? 1234qwer1234qwer4 23:55, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:30, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:33, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try. Also notified of this discussion at Chrysolite.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 18:29, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Geez, a 4th relist, but wow ... the direction of the discussion seemed to change substantially after the most recent relist, so it's worth giving this another go to see if consensus gets clearer.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 23:41, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LEИIИGЯAD Cowboy

Split or bespoke decisions Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep LEИIИGЯAD Cowboy but delete LEIIIGIaAD Cowboy

Universal Studios

"Universal Studios" is typically used to refer to either Universal Pictures, the film studio (as a nickname/former name), or the various theme parks around the globe named "Universal Studios" that are operated by Universal Destinations & Experiences. The parent company of both divisions is also named Universal Studios, Inc., which is where universalstudios.com points to (versus universalpictures.com and universaldestinationsandexperiences.com). Universal Studios currently redirects to Universal Studios, Inc., making it an unnecessary disambiguation, but a recent RM ended with no consensus for a move. Previously, the redirect pointed to Universal Pictures. I'm not convinced a primary topic can be determined here, given the two- or three-way split, so I would call for turning this redirect into a disambiguation page. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Best case I can present here is that the number of monthly pageviews Universal Pictures receives dwarfs every other Wikipedia article covering some aspect of the company. Outside of Wikipedia, it's much of the same. When you visit the main company's website, the film IP is front and center. When you visit their theme parks, film is front and center there too. Marketing? Yep, still front and center. The entire company revolves around (and depends on) it's film intellectual property, despite having a presence in other areas. Clearly, "Universal Studios" is a term that is most closely associated with the motion picture division of the company. The only other real competition here is Universal Destinations & Experiences, but per WP:DISAMBIG#Deciding to disambiguate, we simply place that in a hatnote like it is currently at Universal Pictures. If someone really feels a disambig page is necessary, we can add that to the hatnote as well. Simple.
BTW, even if the result is no consensus, the redirect should revert back to its former target, Universal Pictures. There doesn't appear to be consensus for that change either. --GoneIn60 (talk) 19:44, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'll preface this by saying that consensus is presumed unless reverted, so we do have four months worth of implicit consensus for Universal Studios' current target, and many years worth of implicit consensus for Universal Pictures' current title.
Now, let me present a counterargument. If you look up "Universal Studios" on any search engine, depending on where you are located, you'll most likely see results for the theme park closest to you. For me, it's Universal Studios Hollywood, but you might get Universal Studios Florida, Universal Studios Japan, Universal Studios Singapore, or Universal Studios Beijing. What you likely will not see is Universal Pictures, the film studio, because the word "Studios" does not appear anywhere in the name "Universal Pictures"; it's simply being used as a shorthand or nickname. If you look at sources that discuss the film studio and theme parks, most use "Universal Pictures" to refer to the studio and "Universal Studios _____" to refer to the parks. I don't dispute the fact that Universal Pictures is more notable/important/popular than Universal Studios (the theme parks), but what's the evidence that readers are likely looking for Universal Pictures (a non-title match) rather than the many other pages whose title contains "Universal Studios" when they search the latter term? InfiniteNexus (talk) 22:26, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"consensus is presumed unless reverted" – I know you know I'm a longtime editor (15 years in fact), so you don't need to explain implicit consensus to me, probably just like I don't need to explain to you that it's also the weakest form of consensus that only exists UNTIL "disputed or reverted" (either qualifies). It should be clear I've disputed it, but even if that escaped your attention, did you already forget about this revert by Intrisit? Or how about this revert by 162 etc.? Perhaps I should also take a moment to point out that STATUSQUO is just an essay with zero bite, since you've used it as justification in one of those reverts.
"we do have four months worth...for Universal Studios' current target", "many years...for Universal Pictures current title" – Really? Prior to May, we had 7 years for Universal Studios → Universal Pictures! You can't see this in the immediate history, because the redirect was overwritten in December 2023 by a page move, but it had been like that for years following the 2017 technical move I linked above. 4 months doesn't hold a candle to 7 years, but regardless of the comparison here, presumed consensus is non-existent at this point. It's the same deal regarding the "Universal Pictures" article title. The article was previously titled "Universal Studios" for nearly 14 years, nearly double the amount of time it has been titled "Universal Pictures". Arguing in favor of recent presumed consensus while conveniently ignoring the previous presumed consensus that existed for a greater length of time doesn't make any sense. Your "preface" didn't do your counterargument any favors.
"If you look up "Universal Studios" on any search engine..." – I think it's time you move away from this notion of relying on a basic web search for the premise of your argument. You did this in the previous discussion, and I showed back then (as I'll do now) that these are misleading arguments to bring to the table without proper context. The problem with using Google in the manner you are doing so now is that the "top hits" are tailored to advertising. SEO marketers exploit weaknesses in Google's search algorithms, such as PageRank, to game the system and push to the top of search result rankings. The problem continues to get worse each year, despite improvements made by Google and competing search engines. What you are witnessing in the results is bias; a bias toward marketing/selling/advertising. A better test would be to use Google Books, search on "Universal Studios" in quotes, and then on the results page, refine the results by using the dropdown "Any document" and selecting "Books" only (IMO, the other formats are more likely to cover travel and leisure in the form of advertising, skewing the results). Now what you'll find is that the first page is 4 hits movie studio, 6 theme park. There are some Econoguide and other travel-type publication hits on the next couple pages that favor theme parks, but from page 4 through page 10, the hits are predominantly the movie studio, and by a wide margin. I didn't spend time digging beyond that, but feel free, as this is a more reliable result that holds more weight. Do you find that interesting? I certainly did.
In any case, this may not be the so-called evidence required, and a disambig page is still an acceptable alternative, but let's not pretend that the recent change to the redirect back in May has any kind of standing consensus. Should this discussion end in no consensus, you can bet I'll be reverting that change. --GoneIn60 (talk) 10:29, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I recognize implicit consensus is a weak form of consensus; I was addressing your previous statement that there was "no consensus" for the redirect's current target and Universal Pictures' article title — this is not accurate, although there may be stronger consensus for an alternative.
14 years and Google Books are because Universal Pictures used to be known as Universal Studios, not because Universal Studios is currently the common name for Universal Pictures. My search engine example was an effort to put ourselves in readers' shoes and surface what they are most likely looking for. As I noted in the RM, I agree it's not perfect, but it still shouldn't be entirely discarded. InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:30, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"there was "no consensus" for the redirect's current target...this is not accurate" – My statement is entirely accurate, and either you don't seem to fully understand the concept, or you have misinterpreted my statement. Presumed consensus did exist from the time the redirect was changed in May up until the time the recent RM discussion was underway. But it disappeared, poof, vanished, during that discussion as soon as it became obvious that editors disputed the May redirect change. This is why presumed consensus is not worth spending so much time dwelling over or using as a basis for an argument; it is extremely weak. Consensus through editing is no longer presumed when disagreement becomes apparent. As for Universal Pictures, I assume you're referring to the "undiscussed" move comment I made about never getting the discussion it deserved, but I never mention "consensus". You may want to start using quotes to make sure you're getting it right.
"Universal Pictures used to be known as Universal Studios" – I am not following this logic at all in how this relates to 14 years on Wikipedia. Are you trying to draw a correlation between the two that is factual, or just sharing an opinion? Google Books is something concrete we can look at and take into consideration. You're welcome to contribute something as well. The web search, however, is the opposite: flawed and uninformative.
There is also another angle to consider that I pointed out in the RM discussion (which BTW you seem to be avoiding). The pageviews count (1) at Universal Studios, Inc. shot up drastically following the redirect change, which comes as no surprise since we all pretty much agree the redirect change was the wrong move. This is just more supporting evidence of that. It's worth seeing that first and then comparing the pageviews count (2) at the former target, Universal Pictures, you'll notice the 8k+ dropoff that could have happened didn't really happen. A little fluctuation, but not much. The article's traffic essentially holds steady. This implies that Universal Pictures was likely to get that traffic regardless. Kind of an important aspect to consider as well in addition to Google Books and the other points made. --GoneIn60 (talk) 18:52, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know how accurate this is, but according to Universal Pictures' infobox, it was formerly named Universal Studios, so I assumed this is why the Wikipedia article was only moved in 2017 and why some Google Books results use "Universal Studios". If the infobox is wrong, please correct me. Yes, I was referring to your comment on the "undiscussed technical move" of Universal Pictures, and perhaps I shouldn't have paraphrased that as "no consensus", but it seems you were implying that the undiscussed technical move indicates an absence of consensus for the current title.
Regarding the pageviews argument, I no longer claim that Universal Studios, Inc. is the primary topic for "Universal Studios", so I don't contest that Universal Studios should not point to Universal Studios, Inc. I am calling for it to be disambiguated because I don't think Universal Pictures is more "primary" than Universal Studios Hollywood, Universal Studios Florida, et al.
Interestingly, my Google Books results look different than yours. My first page yielded similar results, but pages 4–10 actually had mainly results for the theme parks. Perhaps more telling is that most results for the film studio pertain to the studio's "classic films" (typically the monster movies), i.e. when the studio was (presumably) named Universal Studios. These results were more or less identical when signed out in an incognito tab, so I'm not sure why you got such drastically different results. In any case, while I still don't think we should discard "regular" search entirely (this is how most of our readers navigate the web, not through Google Books or Google Scholar), I took a look at Google Scholar, and the results are similar to Google Books: 5 about the theme parks, 1 about the parent company (hmm, interesting), 3 about the film studio, and somehow the Masterminds production notes ended up on the first page. Second page onward are predominantly about the theme parks, with some monster movies sprinkled in. Google News is virtually all about the theme parks. Are you getting similar results? InfiniteNexus (talk) 20:35, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"it seems you were implying that the undiscussed technical move indicates..." – Nope, simply saying it didn't get the discussion it deserved, full stop. In that discussion, we would have found out if it had consensus. I'm not claiming to know what the outcome would have definitely been.
"I don't know how accurate this is, but ... it was formerly named Universal Studios" – Company infoboxes, especially when they're collapsed like that, rarely get the attention they need to be accurate. This one has an entry for 1996–2014 that is conflating the company with the motion picture division (you can read this in the body), which actually demonstrates the point I'm trying to make! "Universal Studios" is often used interchangeably to refer to "Universal Pictures". People often do this. Books often do this. Editors on Wikipedia apparently do this (thanks for the example). Just another real-world example of why it's harmless for the redirect to point here.
You're missing the point about the the pageviews data. I already acknowledged we all agree about the parent company. This is what you need to focus on. More than 8,000 monthly hits at that redirect (people navigating to "Universal Studios") were taken away from Universal Pictures, yet this went nearly undetected in the average monthly views on that page. The traffic there essentially stays the same. I don't think we can ignore something like that.
"...when the studio was (presumably) named Universal Studios" – So here's what's going to happen. I'm going to explain this, and you are going to move onto the next perceived flaw you can find and see what you can expose. But nevertheless, the company originally opened as Universal City Studios in 1915. Its film division has always to some extent been known as Universal Pictures (there may have been a "Company" tacked on at one point in the mid 20th century). But what you'll notice is that there are books, newspapers, and magazines published from the 1920s all the way through the 2010s that still state "Universal Studios" when casually referring to either the company or the film studio. Interestingly, even from the very beginning, they preferred to drop "City" from the name in publications. Also, it didn't seem too important to distinguish "Universal Pictures" from the main company name. Seems they were always viewed predominantly as one and the same.
That's my personal understanding based on how the terms are interchangeably tossed around in sources. Only in official business relations or documents (or on screen) is extra care seem to be given to "Universal Pictures", which doesn't make it the common name, nor does it necessarily make it a good article title. As for your Google Books results being different than mine, I'll re-run it and post a list of my results. I don't see why those would be different unless we are running the search differently. Google Scholar is fine, but I think Google News suffers from some of the same bias and should be discounted. It's not a good test for this particular topic/debate. -- GoneIn60 (talk) 21:59, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, let's say Universal Pictures is often referred to as "Universal Studios" by academic sources (I take issue with this assertion and ignoring other types of sources, but I'm just going to WP:LETITGO and move on at this point). For the sake of argument, let's suppose that the use of "Universal Studios" to refer to the studio is just as common as using "Universal Pictures", which is the name seen in the opening credits of virtually all Universal pictures and therefore recognizable to most readers. But how does this show that the use of "Universal Studios" to refer to the film studio is substantially more common than the use of "Universal Studios" to refer to the theme parks of the same name? The pageviews argument is interesting, but I think we have convincing evidence that it is also very common to use "Universal Studios" to refer to ... well, Universal Studios. If the parks weren't named "Universal Studios", that would be a different story. InfiniteNexus (talk) 03:57, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm back after stepping away for off-wiki commitments. At this point, the lack of participation from new editors (aside from 2pou) indicates this debate has run its course. I'm actually surprised it's still open, but I will close with this...
Your observation "the name seen in the opening credits of virtually all Universal pictures" relies on non-independent, primary sources. I'm sure you're aware from other discussions that when COMMONNAME is invoked, we seek out prevalence in independent sources. We wouldn't treat a primary topic redirect any differently.
The pageviews argument is just one of several angles given, along with Google Books (despite our experiences diverging in this RfD, which may need further exploration down the road). Then there's the WikiNav data explored below illustrating that guests searching for "Universal Studios" are not immediately jumping to theme park articles as you would expect after landing in the wrong article. The hatnote is right there at the top, front and center, and this might be the most convincing data to date (though you may find a reason to doubt it as well if you are beyond convincing, but if that's the case, why bother debating?). Redirecting to a disambig page isn't the end of the world. Not terrible, not great, not really optimal, but fine for now. -- GoneIn60 (talk) 08:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also back after a few days of absence. The portion of my quote you left out is important: the name seen in the opening credits of virtually all Universal pictures and therefore recognizable to most readers (emphasis added). I brought this up because anyone who has seen a Universal picture in the last few decades will likely remember reading "Universal Pictures presents" in front of every film. They won't recall hearing "Universal Studios" anywhere other than (possibly) common parlance or the theme parks ("We're going to Universal Studios!"). This is not advocating for simply adhering to the WP:OFFICIALNAME, I'm making the case that it is the common name precisely because general audiences are so widely exposed to use of the official name. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:26, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Just a preemptive apology to the closer for continuing this very long RfD. The following points need to be made, despite that this round of debate appears to be headed to disambiguation (an acceptable option).
2pou: Glad you jumped in and brought up WikiNav. That's where I was going next before getting sucked into off-Wiki commitments. First, I should clarify that I wasn't arguing that Universal Pictures depended solely on traffic from the redirect. This page gets over 100k monthly views, and the redirect is only responsible for approx 6-7k views. My point was that in the 4-month period following the redirect change, its monthly view count remained fairly steady. There was some fluctuation, but not enough to match what the redirect consistently brought to the table. Is it possible that incoming traffic from other sources saw an uptick during the same timeframe? Sure, it's possible, but it's also unlikely.
So getting back to WikiNav data... You were on the right track, except we should be evaluating the redirect target "Universal Studios, Inc.", which is where people land when searching for "Universal Studios". This is a point of interest, because in earlier discussion we've concluded that "Universal Studios, Inc." fails as the primary topic. We'd like to get a glimpse of where outgoing traffic is headed. In theory, there should be a significant number landing there unexpectedly, leading to some portion of outgoing pageviews headed toward other "Universal Studios" articles. So what does the WikiNav data reveal? Universal Pictures is the #2 hit with 1,520 targets, and none of the theme park articles are in the top 10...Wow! In fact, you have to expand the top 20 just to see one, where you'll also see a partial title match named "Universal Animation Studios" ranked at #12 (151 targets). "Universal Studios Hollywood" sits at #17 (62 targets), and "Universal Studios Florida" sits at #19 (56 targets). They're barely a blip on the radar in comparison. The page gets a total of 14k monthly views, which as we discussed above owes a big chunk to the redirect (6k+ redirected hits per month) that changed in May. These two sets of numbers can help us draw a pretty reliable conclusion.
Even more interesting to me is that the very first link in the article appears in the hatnote which reads, "For the theme parks, see Universal Destinations & Experiences", yet it doesn't even register in the top 20 for outgoing traffic! For all this talk about the theme parks being one of the intended targets for those searching "Universal Studios", that doesn't appear to hold any weight whatsoever according to the WikiNav outgoing data. Something should be registering out of thousands of redirects, but we aren't seeing anything. --GoneIn60 (talk) 07:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC) (updated 16:06, 7 October 2024 (UTC))[reply]
@GoneIn60: Sorry; I didn't mean to suggest you were relying solely on traffic. I understood that, I just wanted to make sure we don't just look at the number it spits out without considering those factors because it was going to be a very high number regardless. I did look at the Universal Studios, Inc. clickstream, and I, too, found it interesting that it didn't funnel people to any parks. I was discussing the Universal Pictures info because I was looking closer at the long-term history before the redirect was retargeted. While I think the data for Universal Studios, Inc. was interesting, I'm seeing that the data is a bit older. It says the data was dumped in August 2024, so it hasn't actually captured the incoming/outgoing traffic since the retargeting on September 10. Overall, I do lean towards disambiguation due to the sheer number of options, but I do agree that if it were to remain a redirect, Universal Pictures is the better option. Several articles for older films, actors, actresses, directors, etc. link there intending the (now) Universal Pictures page. (Yes, that can be resolved via clerical edits...)
I didn't realize until now that Universal Studios, Inc. was only "created" (via a split and move of sorts by HeroWikia - legacy company still captured at MCA_Inc.) in April this year. -2pou (talk) 18:03, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2pou, unless I'm missing something, this all goes back to the redirect change made in May by MinionsFan1998. So the data in August 2024 would be a valid date range to assess.
As for a disambiguation page, I don't disagree there needs to be one. However, I disagree the title of it needs to be "Universal Studios"; instead it should be Universal Studios (disambiguation). We can link to it in a hatnote at Universal Pictures, a common practice described at WP:DISAMBIG#Deciding to disambiguate (and also something I mentioned in my original !vote). Then restore the redirect to its original target (Universal Pictures) based on the evidence provided. --GoneIn60 (talk) 19:28, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, you're right. I didn't go back through the history far enough when I saw the 10Sep retarget. Thanks for pointing that out.
I don't have super strong feelings about where the dab page goes, but I do have doubts in having Universal Studios, Inc. as the target. -2pou (talk) 00:43, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, and I'm with you about the current target. It's the least qualified for sure. My concern with having the redirect go to a DAB page right off the bat, is that there will be quite a bit of work needed to resolve the issues it creates. There appears to be 3,862 Wikilinks from articles using the redirect, and when you look at a lot of those links, they were created with the intention of directing readers to Universal Pictures.
Here's one random example I checked from the list...Piper Laurie. Just read the opening of the Career section and this source (the latter of which was inserted by one of our great copyeditors who sadly is no longer with us). "Universal Studios" is being used in the context of the film studio. We could potentially see many hundreds, if not thousands of these links now land on a DAB page unnecessarily.
We are left with three options:
  1. Keep as is – Worst one. Universal Studios, Inc. is essentially the history of "Music Corporation of America", how it came to be, its 1962 buyout of Universal, and everything post-buyout. Many who land here will be confused, as they expect to be reading about Universal's history.
  2. Retarget to DAB – Better, but far from perfect. Retargeting here will essentially break a lot of these older links that were meant for "Universal Pictures", forcing readers to make an extra hop (and to choose correctly). It will also create the most work moving forward to manually update and correct these links down the road.
  3. Restore original target → Universal Pictures – Best by far given the # of Wikilinks, along with WikiNAV data on the topic phrase "Universal Studios". In addition, we have some loose off-Wiki data from Google Books that seems to support long-term significance in favor of the film studio (theme parks compete but do not overtake the film studio in this space).
Knowing what you know now, 2pou, are you still split between options 2 and 3, or do you have a preference between them? -- GoneIn60 (talk) 05:11, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@GoneIn60: The "Retargeting [to the disambiguation page] will essentially break a lot of these older links that were meant for "Universal Pictures", forcing readers to make an extra hop (and to choose correctly)" will not be a concern if this redirect is disambiguated, considering an internal Wikipedia project page, WP:DPL, encourages editors to disambiguate links that link to or point to disambiguation pages, and there are several editors who work on this. Seriously, if there is one aspect of Wikipedia I have seen consistent over the past 10+ years, other than article creation, it is the plethora of editors ready to disambiguate links. Steel1943 (talk) 01:08, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Even more interesting to me is that the very first link in the article appears in the hatnote which reads, "For the theme parks, see Universal Destinations & Experiences", yet it doesn't even register in the top 20 for outgoing traffic! The hatnotes (on both Universal Studios, Inc. and Universal Pictures) are new and were added by me on the day I opened the RM that preceded this one. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:26, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
InfiniteNexus, thanks for pointing that out. I did not catch that in the history. Looks like you added the hatnote on August 31, and I like how you placed both options in there (the main theme parks article and the film studio article). Hopefully we'll get a chance to see WikiNav update soon to show September's data. Its clickstream data dump usually drops in the first few days of the following month, and from what I gather, this is usually processed and displayed about a week later on the 12th. We'll know shortly if the theme park company link in the hatnote became a factor in September.
It's also worth noting a few things. Using the "Search" box to jump to your next destination will still be tracked by WikiNav in outgoing traffic. Even without the hatnote, WikiNav would have still been capturing searches from that page. So for Universal theme park seekers getting their searches right on the 2nd try (by being more specific), we would have seen that in the August data. So I'm a bit skeptical we'll see a huge difference, but we'll see. In addition, the version of the article heading into August did contain Universal theme park links in the Takeover section as well as in the navbox at the bottom. To be fair, "Universal Pictures" was more prominent, appearing one section earlier and also in the infobox. GoneIn60 (talk) 08:56, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:49, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes (talk / cont) 21:53, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Barangay 79

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 5#Barangay 79

User:@Sir MemeGod

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy delete

"Degrassi characters" redirects

Back in 2021, the target page was moved from the last redirect's title to List of Degrassi Junior High & Degrassi High characters (which is worth keeping at the current target since it's accurate and describes exactly what is promised by its title) to avoid confusion with List of Degrassi: The Next Generation characters and List of Degrassi: Next Class characters, but apparently these redirects have stayed at the target for all these months since this move happened. I'm not 100% sure if the current target is the best place to take readers searching any of these terms; but I'm torn between keeping, disambiguating, and deleting; since the target article is the longstanding page of each redirect. I thought I'd bring them to RfD to discuss the best course of action, and I'd like to hear your thoughts on this matter. Regards, SONIC678 18:24, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inside Head

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

You were working as a waitress in a cocktail bar

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

A-hunting we will go, a-hunting we will go, heigh-o, the derry-o, a-hunting we will go

Despite being implausible, unlikely as a search term, and wholly unmentioned not at the target article, but also unmentioned across all of Wikipedia, the redirect is also incorrect. It should be "heigh ho", not "heigh o". This exact spelling becomes near impossibly unlikely in the grand scheme of things, keeping in mind that all this time we're simply targeting "Yankee Doodle". People looking for the correctly spelled lyric, will not find it here either. No mention of "hunting" at the target. Utopes (talk / cont) 08:17, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just realized: these lyrics aren't even for Yankee Doodle! A-Hunting We Will Go has existed since 2010 so I have ZERO clue how this could have possibly happened, besides expectable carelessness from the mass-redirect creations of unmentioned & unverified lyrics, filled with typos and implausible formatting.
For this page, A-Hunting We Will Go does currently contain lyrics in the article, and the lyrics indeed say "heigh ho". But these are also unsourced and should be removed from the article as well, per WP:NOTLYRICS and not being encyclopedic content. Lyrics can be included on Wikiquote or Lyricfinder if desired, or wherever the appropriate place to put such lyrics, on any site that isn't Wikipedia (because Wikipedia is not a lyric database). Utopes (talk / cont) 08:35, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to A-Hunting We Will Go anyways, despite the impending removal of lyrics; the title of the song IS present in the redirect, and it would definitely be going to the right place if retargeted.
In other news, this was APPARENTLY created from scratch in August of this year by user:Kjell Knudde; however the history indicates that Kjell was merely adding categories to an existing redirect?? I've got no clue. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 12:44, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to A-Hunting We Will Go. Cremastra (u — c) 13:25, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pump up the jam, pump it up, while your feet are stumping

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Plaisir d'amour ne dure qu'un moment. Chagrin d'amour dure toute la vie.

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 5#Plaisir d'amour ne dure qu'un moment. Chagrin d'amour dure toute la vie.

Vor der Kaserne vor dem großen Tor stand eine Laterne und steht sie noch davor

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 5#Vor der Kaserne vor dem großen Tor stand eine Laterne und steht sie noch davor

Police and thieves in the street, oh yeah, scaring the nation with their guns and ammunition

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 5#Police and thieves in the street, oh yeah, scaring the nation with their guns and ammunition

Choose life (quote)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

List of Grand Theft Auto Advance characters

No such list or section at target. However, Grand Theft Auto Advance#Setting and characters does exist, but it does not contain a list of characters. (List of Grand Theft Auto Advance characters is a {{R with history}}.) Steel1943 (talk) 22:10, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Czar since they WP:BLARed List of Grand Theft Auto Advance characters in 2015 [73]. Steel1943 (talk) 12:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Restore article? Or simply refine to the "Settings and characters" section of the current target?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 06:02, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree with Jay in that there is no list; someone using this redirect-- which would require someone looking for a list-- would be WP:ASTONISHed to find themselves here. Thus, I disagree with the idea that retaining this redirect is a good idea. I also question the idea of renaming these redirects, given WP:MOVEREDIRECT. Is the history of this page truly important enough to keep that we should rename the redirect in order to prevent it going away when the redirect is deleted, given the extremely low likelihood of it being brought back to a proper article (given its unsourced and non-notable nature)? 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 01:06, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
delete. not present, history had no sources cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes (talk / cont) 07:23, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2025–26 Formula E World Championship

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Antelope horns

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

India as a potential superpower

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Hi-IN

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: withdrawn

Th-TH

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: withdrawn

Neo-mooris

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 3#Neo-mooris

Neo-moors

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 3#Neo-moors

Amanuwil Binyamin Ya'qub Gharib

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy delete

Çornosturuf

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 3#Çornosturuf

Kırıvçe

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 3#Kırıvçe

Necko Jenkins

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

October 26

The ancient city

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Murgh

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 8#Murgh

Barney's Magical Musical Adventure

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 2#Barney's Magical Musical Adventure

Burnt Food

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 2#Burnt Food

Michael J. Burns

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Canales semicirculares anterior

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Cadenas y canales de televisión

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

CSSBuy

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Cruciverbalist

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 2#Cruciverbalist

Crop Protection (journal)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 2#Crop Protection (journal)

Crean Hill, Ontario

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Craig Joint Theater Hospital

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 2#Craig Joint Theater Hospital

Cowboy Luttrell

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 7#Cowboy Luttrell

Roger M. Cooke

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Conerve

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 7#Conerve

Communist Party (Kosovo)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 4#Communist Party (Kosovo)

CNN Underscored

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Enslaved Africans

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Pizzaface

Disambiguate Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: disambiguate

Fântânele River (Mureș)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 4#Fântânele River (Mureș)

Bhairabi Temple, Boudh district

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 2#Bhairabi Temple, Boudh district

Ra'ad 1

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 2#Ra'ad 1

Melonade

Not mentioned at target; listed in Lucozade#Variants but there is also a more general Wiktionary entry at wikt:melonade. 1234qwer1234qwer4 23:42, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:16, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:20, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cremastra (u — c) 15:21, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scottish Nose-pickers

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 2#Scottish Nose-pickers

I'm sorry, Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Linjian

The name, which is that of a town in the Chinese province of Shandong, is being redirected to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China spokesperson with same name. Either it should be deleted or be redirected to the target page I have given.Toadboy123 (talk) 03:47, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cremastra (u — c) 14:31, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Klm Ryl Dtch Airlines

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Ain't I a stinker? (remaining bundle)

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

It's time to d-d-d-d-duel

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 7#It's time to d-d-d-d-duel

Tiff & Tuff (Chara(c)ters)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Hall Airport

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

2001 attacks

These redirects assume that 9/11 is the only terrorist attack that happened in 2001, which is false. I suggest retargeting them to List of terrorist incidents in 2001. As for 2001 attacks, it can probably be downright deleted by RC,IR as it was made less than a year ago. SeaHaircutSoilReplace (talk) 23:35, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget per above. There were some similar redirects rfed earlier this year but I forget which. PARAKANYAA (talk) 19:37, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 15:52, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget Someone typing "2001 terrorist attacks" is much more likely to be looking for a list of terrorist attacks that happened in 2001, especially if they don't know beforehand what title we gave it. That's just a very natural way to search for it. Also, readers looking for 9/11 will easily find it at that target page, while the opposite is way less obvious. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 02:13, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
SeaHaircutSoilReplace (talk) 14:00, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Last year, 2001 terrorist attacks got 29 views, which is good enough for me. Even if nobody is using it (and that's not the case), that's not a reason to delete per WP:CHEAP. Cremastra (u — c) 14:32, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Cremastra It's not about deleting the redirects, it's about retargeting them to more appropriate targets, as I suggested when I first started this RfD 2 weeks ago. Besides, I only suggested deleting the more recent redirect as a last resort. Aside from that, I never suggested deleting the older redirect created back in 2006, just retargeting it to a more plausible target. SeaHaircutSoilReplace (talk) 16:05, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@SeaHaircutSoilReplace Then I'm afraid I don't understand your argument. Just because it's the primary topic doesn't mean people are gonna search for it. As you can see in the viewcounts for the 3 redirects, the latter two get like, nothing, compared to the 9/11 redirect. How do low pageviews point to retargeting to List of terrorist incidents in 2001? Cremastra (u — c) 16:14, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Cremastra Because barely anyone uses the redirects for going to the 9/11 page (given the pageviews). Because people are more likely to search for 9/11 instead of either of the 2 redirects, it only makes sense that the 2 redirects redirect to the list of 2001 incidents (given the massive ambiguity of "2001 attacks" compared to 9/11, see Chaotic Enby and Steel1943's points), in spite of the points of 9/11 being the most notable of all the other 2001 incidents. PTOPIC isn't exactly clear if people don't search for the 2 redirects and instead search for 9/11. SeaHaircutSoilReplace (talk) 16:24, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@SeaHaircutSoilReplace If "barely anyone" uses the redirects for navigating to 9/11, I don't see how the pageviews will increase if we retarget. I still don't entirely follow your train of thought here. People do use these redirects, and since 9/11 is the PTOPIC here, I simply don't see how retargetting to a more general target is the most helpful option for readers here. Like CFA and Tavix said, it's the primary topic and redirects are cheap. You say it only makes sense that the 2 redirects redirect to the list of 2001 incidents, but I'm still struggling to understand why it makes sense. You seem to be assuming that readers don't use these redirects because (in your view) they point to the wrong place, and that by retargetting to a more general target, pageviews will increase. Readers aren't looking at RfD. They aren't going to spread the word that the redirect got retargetted. Cremastra (u — c) 16:37, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I still don't think 9/11 will be the primary topic, and I never will for that matter. As said earlier, "2001 attacks" is far too vague for anything, including 9/11, to qualify for its primary topic. I'm not going to deal with this any longer. By the way, WP:ICANTHEARYOU seems to apply here. SeaHaircutSoilReplace (talk) 23:09, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Someone disagreeing with you does not mean that they are editing disruptively. C F A 💬 23:37, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All right, sure. But I don't think accusing me of sticking to a viewpoint long after community consensus has decided that moving on would be more productive is, in fact, very productive here. But I digress. The searches do show it's the primary topic for me, but PTOPIC is something reasonable people can disagree on; it's often hard to find. I still don't understand what pageviews have to do with anything, but I'm happy to WP:DROPTHESTICK and leave the horse be. This discussion is probably due for a close anyway. Cremastra (u — c) 19:41, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:49, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of City 17

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Obstipation

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: soft redirect

Wikipedia:VB

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Sonam Maskar

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Uncle Cosmo

still not the biggest columbohead out there, but from a couple days of looking around, i haven't found any relation between this name and columbo (or columbo). is this something from later episodes that just hasn't been mentioned anywhere yet, or...? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Anyone else able to find any sign of this anywhere?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 03:44, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:31, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

retarget to generations: the legacy, since it's the best we got cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 14:04, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:IBP

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: Withdrawn

Back to Gecko

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Picric acid (homeopathic remedy)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 5#Picric acid (homeopathic remedy)

MOS:ASTRO

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Chaotolerance

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 2#Chaotolerance

ChinaFile

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 2#ChinaFile

Chir'daki

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 2#Chir'daki

Murder of Paige Chivers

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 2#Murder of Paige Chivers

Chlaenius atratulus and Chlaenius azureulus

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Cozy horror

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Chlaenius anchomenoides and some

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

1HQ3Go3ggs8pFnXuHVHRytPCq5fGG8Hbhx

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 4#1HQ3Go3ggs8pFnXuHVHRytPCq5fGG8Hbhx

October 25

Wikipedia:ZNB

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Geoffrey Chalmers

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Arbeitsamt

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 4#Arbeitsamt

S-compact space

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 4#S-compact space

Usurper King

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 1#Usurper King

N3rd

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Isometry (mathematics)

No consensus Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: no consensus

Quran Afghanistan

Very general term; this Quran doesn't come up in the entire first page of google results. I'm not seeing a primary topic here. Rusalkii (talk) 19:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise Quran in Afghanistan . 19:10, 23 September 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rusalkii (talk • contribs)
I've added that to this discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 19:41, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, mwwv converse∫edits 11:27, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as classic WP:XY. -1ctinus📝🗨 14:12, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is not an XY situation at all, as the redirect only refers to a single topic. It may or may not be vague or ambiguous, but it isn't XY. Thryduulf (talk) Thryduulf (talk) 14:44, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:31, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as too ambiguous; there are probably hundreds of Qurans in the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 13:24, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Searches for "Quran in Afghanistan" return mostly the 2012 Afghanistan Quran burning protests, followed by some assorted social media slosh. My leaning is delete because this ambiguous, but I'm willing to try drafting a DAB page. Cremastra (u — c) 14:23, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done at Quran in Afghanistan. Cremastra (u — c) 20:22, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on disambig?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes (talk / cont) 23:02, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The current target of these redirects, World's Largest Handmade Quran in Afghanistan, has been nominated for WP:AFD (AfD discussion): If the current target gets deleted, a disambiguation page would be a WP:TWODAB situation. Steel1943 (talk) 19:32, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Snapseed 2.22.412829873

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 4#Snapseed 2.22.412829873

Spacelike vector

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 4#Spacelike vector

Tick tock tick tock tick tock

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Farage riots

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Texvc

Legacy cruft does not warrant a double soft redirect from mainspace. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 09:32, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This is all over the place - any more support for TechnoSquirrel69's compromise suggestion?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 21:50, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Symbolism (arts)

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Cancellated

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 4#Cancellated

India women's national futsal team

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 1#India women's national futsal team

Zelda 2016

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 1#Zelda 2016

Japanese opera

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

2007-06-17 (June 17, 2007)

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

List of Yoshi series bosses

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Mrinal Chauhan

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

List of deputy speakers of the Goa Legislative Assembly

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Hoppy the Frog

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

2028 World Athletics Indoor Championships

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Future Formula One World Championships

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

Future Indian Premier League seasons

Split or bespoke decisions Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: Keep 2026, Delete the rest

CSSHQ

Keep Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

Ceddin Deden

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 4#Ceddin Deden

Eirik Suhrke

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 1#Eirik Suhrke

April 4, 1974

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

Will (sociology)

No consensus Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: no consensus

2025 AFC U-20 Asian Cup squads

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

2025 FIFA Beach Soccer World Cup squads

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

2025 Africa Cup of Nations squads

Delete Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: delete

June 3, 2007

Retarget Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget